Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB497

Introduced
4/3/15  
Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/5/15  
Report Pass
5/5/15  
Engrossed
5/13/15  
Engrossed
5/13/15  
Refer
5/14/15  
Refer
5/14/15  
Report Pass
5/26/15  
Report Pass
5/26/15  
Enrolled
6/9/15  
Enrolled
6/9/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  

Caption

Provides for the recovery of damages for injuries arising out of an act of terror

Impact

The enactment of HB 497 is intended to enhance the legal protections for victims of terrorism by facilitating easier recovery of damages associated with such acts. This legislation marks an important change in state law, expanding the scope of liability and providing greater financial support for victims. The inclusion of potential attorney fees and court costs is particularly significant, as it aims to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims that may arise in the sensitive context of terrorism-related injuries.

Summary

House Bill 497 establishes a legal framework for recovering damages related to injuries caused by acts of terror in Louisiana. The bill introduces Civil Code Article 2315.9, which allows a prevailing plaintiff to receive not only general and special damages but also court costs and reasonable attorney fees if they can prove that their injuries were a result of a terrorist act. This provision applies to injuries to both individuals and property, regardless of whether the defendant was ultimately prosecuted for their acts of terrorism.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 497 appears to be favorable, particularly among representatives and advocates for victims' rights who view it as a necessary measure to bolster legal recourse for those affected by terrorism. However, concerns may exist regarding the definitions of terrorism and potential misuse of this legal framework, reflecting a cautious optimism among some stakeholders. The bill's passage indicates a legislative commitment to addressing the ramifications of terrorism on individuals and communities.

Contention

One notable point of contention in discussions about HB 497 is the delineation of what constitutes an 'act of terror' or 'terrorism.' Critics may argue that the definitions provided might be too broad or vague, potentially leading to a wide range of claims that could burden the court system. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the implications of the courts being tasked with determining the frivolous nature of claims related to terrorism, which could lead to resource allocation challenges. Overall, HB 497 represents an attempt to balance the need for victim recovery rights while also safeguarding against potential abuse of the legal system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.