Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB662

Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  

Caption

Provides relative to the review of state content standards for public school students

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the state laws concerning educational standards by mandating a review of existing content every seven years. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining a high level of rigor in these standards to meet the evolving academic and vocational demands. Furthermore, it ensures that the review process is inclusive and transparent, requiring public comments and adherence to the Open Meetings Law. This legislative change could lead to updates in the curriculum used across public schools, directly affecting how subjects are taught.

Summary

House Bill 662 aims to establish a process for the review of state content standards for public school students in Louisiana. The bill specifies that the review process for English language arts and mathematics standards must commence immediately and outlines the formation of a standards review committee comprising educators, administrators, parents, and industry representatives. This committee is tasked with evaluating current standards and making necessary recommendations to ensure that educational benchmarks remain rigorous, thus preparing students effectively for postsecondary education and the workplace.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around HB 662 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Proponents believe that creating a formal review process for educational standards will enhance the quality of education and, subsequently, student preparedness. They argue that such measures are essential for sustaining educational excellence. However, there are lingering concerns about how these reviews will be conducted and whether adequate resources will be allocated to implement suggested changes effectively.

Contention

Some points of contention may revolve around the composition of the standards review committee and the inclusivity of its recommendations. Opponents may voice concerns regarding potential biases in the selection of committee members, emphasizing the need for true representation of diverse perspectives in education. Additionally, the ongoing debate about the appropriateness of state mandates over local autonomy in education could also surface, posing questions about the balance of power between state regulations and local school governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB852

Pupil instruction: academic content standards: update of adopted standards.

CO HB1054

Jail Standards Commission Recommendations

CA SB1223

Construction industry: discrimination and harassment prevention policy.

CA AB835

State Fire Marshal: building standards: single-exit, single stairway apartment houses: report.

OK HB3275

Schools; requiring standards changes to be made one year prior to certain textbook adoption cycle; effective date; emergency.

NJ A1220

Prohibits State Agriculture Development Committee from imposing new or revised agricultural rules, regulations, or standards on previously preserved farmland or owners thereof, without owner consent.

NJ A4714

Prohibits State Agriculture Development Committee from imposing new or revised agricultural rules, regulations, or standards on previously preserved farmland or owners thereof, without owner consent.

CA SB530

Construction industry: discrimination and harassment prevention.