Louisiana House Bill HB67

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/15
• Refer: 3/9/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 5/6/15
• Engrossed: 5/14/15
• Refer: 5/18/15
• Report Pass: 5/26/15
• Enrolled: 6/7/15
• Chaptered: 6/29/15
• Passed: 6/29/15

Caption

Excludes retired district attorneys and retired assistant district attorneys from prosecution for the illegal carrying of weapons in certain circumstances (EN NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 67 could have significant implications on state laws pertaining to weapon possession and the rights afforded to law enforcement officials post-retirement. The bill modifies existing laws to ensure that retired district attorneys and their assistants retain certain firearm privileges, which they may need for personal safety and security. This change not only aligns with the professional circumstances of these individuals but also strengthens their legal standing regarding firearm possession, potentially influencing future legislation in this area.

Summary

House Bill 67 aims to amend existing regulations regarding the illegal carrying of weapons by creating an exception for retired district attorneys and assistant district attorneys under specific circumstances. The bill allows these retired officials to possess and conceal handguns, as long as they are certified annually in the use of firearms and possess valid identification attesting to their retired status. This legislative change seeks to acknowledge the unique role that these former officials play, as their professional backgrounds may necessitate greater access to personal protection.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 67 appears to lean towards support, particularly from groups advocating for the rights of retired law enforcement personnel. Proponents argue that this legislation addresses the legitimate need for retired district attorneys and assistants to protect themselves, particularly in light of the sometimes hazardous nature of their previous roles. However, there may be concerns among some factions regarding the implications of expanding firearm rights, raising questions of public safety and the broader effects of allowing more individuals to carry concealed weapons.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 67 may arise from the balance between individual rights and public safety. Critics may express concerns that an increase in the number of concealed firearms held by individuals with specific professional backgrounds could lead to potential misuse or escalation in confrontational situations. Moreover, the criteria for exemption, including qualifications and the definitions of mental impairments that would disqualify certain individuals, may become focal points for debate, particularly in discussions about mental health and firearm rights.