Louisiana House Bill HB7

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/15
• Refer: 2/6/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 4/21/15
• Engrossed: 4/27/15
• Refer: 4/28/15
• Report Pass: 5/12/15
• Enrolled: 6/10/15
• Chaptered: 7/1/15
• Passed: 7/1/15

Caption

Amends provisions of law regarding unauthorized entry of a critical infrastructure

Impact

This legislation extends the legal definitions and penalties associated with unauthorized entry into critical infrastructure, thereby enhancing security measures for these essential facilities. By recognizing the use of fraudulent documents as a means to gain entry, the bill aims to combat potential threats that such facilities face. The law establishes clear penalties for unauthorized entry, including fines up to one thousand dollars and possible imprisonment of up to six years, which serves to deter potential violations and protect these crucial assets.

Summary

House Bill 7 focuses on the crime of unauthorized entry into critical infrastructure in Louisiana. It amends the existing provisions to include not only physical entry without authorization but also the use of fraudulent documents for identification purposes to gain access. The bill specifies several facilities categorized as critical infrastructure, such as chemical plants, refineries, electrical power facilities, and water treatment plants. Additionally, it addresses the consequences of remaining on such premises after being prohibited by an authorized representative.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 7 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers, as indicated by the unanimous vote in favor of the bill during its passage. The representatives likely view the legislation as an important step towards fortifying security measures surrounding critical infrastructure. However, there are underlying tensions regarding the extent of the new legal definitions, especially concerning the definition of 'fraudulent documents' and the potential implications this may have for civil rights and lawful protest in the vicinity of these facilities.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 7 pertains to the balance between security and the rights of individuals. While proponents argue that the bill is necessary for protecting infrastructure, critics raise concerns about how broadly the terms 'unauthorized entry' and 'fraudulent documents' could be interpreted. There is a fear that such broad definitions may infringe upon individuals' rights to lawful assembly and protest, especially in contexts where critical infrastructure may be at the center of public debate.