Expresses the intended meaning of Act No. 859 of the 2004 R.S.
Impact
The resolution aims to reinforce the legislative intent behind Act No. 859, which mandates state agencies to consider local master plans before undertaking activities that affect their elements. By clarifying this requirement, HCR190 seeks to ensure that local governments retain a level of authority and influence over their development plans and that state actions align with the goals and designs put forth in these plans. As a result, this can lead to more cohesive urban and regional planning that respects local priorities.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 190 (HCR190) was introduced by Representative Tim Burns to express the intended meaning of Act No. 859 of the 2004 Regular Session of the Legislature. This resolution clarifies that the phrase 'shall consider' in R.S. 33:109.1 should be interpreted to mean that state agencies and departments are required to act in compliance with a local parish or municipal master plan to the greatest extent practicable. This is significant as it emphasizes the importance of local planning efforts when state actions potentially impact these plans.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR190 appears to be supportive among legislators who prioritize local governance and planning. Proponents view this resolution as a critical tool for local governments, while those who may oppose it could argue about the complexities or potential inefficiencies it might introduce when state agencies coordinate with local plans. Overall, the discussion emphasizes a balance between state oversight and local decision-making.
Contention
While there may not be significant contention directly noted, one potential point of discussion is how this resolution may impact the operations of state agencies tasked with planning and development. Concerns could arise regarding the practical implications of requiring state agencies to comply with local master plans, especially in situations where state and local priorities differ. The resolution seeks to establish a firm understanding of compliance, but it may create scenarios where local and state interests may conflict, necessitating careful negotiation and consideration.
Provides for an in-depth study of the need for a plan for the conduct of a constitutional convention, creates a committee for such purpose, and expresses legislative intent to call a convention based upon the results of such study