Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HCR74

Introduced
4/22/15  
Refer
4/27/15  
Report Pass
5/18/15  
Report Pass
5/18/15  
Engrossed
5/28/15  
Engrossed
5/28/15  
Refer
6/1/15  
Refer
6/1/15  
Report Pass
6/2/15  
Report Pass
6/2/15  

Caption

Requests professional licensing boards and commissions to ensure compliance with laws pertaining to licensure of military members and military spouses

Impact

If adopted, HCR74 would reinforce the intent of existing Louisiana statutes that aim to facilitate the licensure process for military families. It addresses issues where licensing boards may have interpreted these laws too restrictively, thus potentially excluding qualified military personnel and their spouses from pursuing their chosen careers. By calling for a more liberal interpretation of the licensing requirements, the resolution encourages boards to expedite the processing of applications to ensure military members and spouses can practice their professions without unnecessary barriers.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 74 (HCR74) addresses the professional and occupational licensing of military members and their spouses within the state of Louisiana. The measure intends to ensure compliance with La. R.S. 37:3651, which mandates that licensing boards provide opportunities for military spouses to obtain licensure in their respective professions when specific criteria are met. HCR74 emphasizes the importance of recognizing the unique circumstances faced by military families and seeks to clarify the legislative intent to support their professional integration in society.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR74 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, with both legislative supporters and military advocates recognizing its necessity. There is a shared understanding of the sacrifices made by military families and a broad agreement that enhancing their ability to work in their trained professions can significantly contribute to their quality of life. This sentiment is echoed by the unanimous support in voting outcomes, reflecting a collective commitment to serve and honor the sacrifices of military personnel.

Contention

While the bill has strong support, some potential contention may arise regarding the interpretation of 'due consideration' and how this would be operationalized by various licensing boards. There were concerns among some members about how the proposed changes might affect the standards of practice across professions, as the measure urges a liberal approach to the licensure requirements. Maintaining a balance between flexibility for military families and ensuring professional standards are upheld is a critical aspect that may require ongoing discussion and clarification.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB614

California Military Department Support Fund activities.

CA AB481

Law enforcement and state agencies: military equipment: funding, acquisition, and use.

TX HB3841

Relating to military duty of a conservator of a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

CA AB361

Military Department: support programs.

CA AB3131

Law enforcement agencies: military equipment: funding, acquisition, and use.

AZ HB2797

Military affairs commission; members

AZ SB1672

Military affairs commission; membership; appropriation

CA AB121

Public animal shelters: adoptions: military service members.