Louisiana House Bill HR183

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/8/15
• Passed: 6/9/15

Caption

Expresses intention and support of the House of Representatives to meet in veto session if the governor vetoes any appropriation or funding the legislature has provided for healthcare and higher education

Impact

If enacted, HR183 would ensure that the House has the opportunity to respond should necessary funding for essential services be vetoed. This mechanism serves to protect budget allocations crucial for the functioning of healthcare systems and educational institutions within the state. The resolution reinforces the legislative authority in budgetary matters and the need for timely enactment of the state's operating budget.

Summary

House Resolution 183 expresses the intention of the Louisiana House of Representatives to convene in a veto session should the governor veto any appropriations or funding related to healthcare and higher education. This resolution underscores the importance of maintaining critical services and functions of state government. It is particularly significant as it reflects the lawmakers' commitment to the continued support of vital services that impact the health, safety, and future of the citizens of Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR183 is generally supportive among lawmakers who are concerned with the continuity of critical services in Louisiana. The bill reflects a proactive approach among legislators who see the potential for disruption in funding if the governor were to issue vetoes. The sentiment is particularly strong within the context of protecting public services, especially healthcare and education, which are vital to constituents.

Contention

Notably, while the resolution signals a strong legislative intent to protect funding, it may also lead to heightened tensions between the executive and legislative branches concerning fiscal priorities. Some opponents may view this as a challenge to executive authority and an indication of deepening divides over appropriations. The requirement for a veto session in the case of a governor's veto adds another layer of complexity to the state budget process, necessitating further discussion about the roles and powers of each branch regarding financial decision-making.