Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB215

Introduced
4/3/15  
Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/20/15  
Report Pass
4/20/15  
Engrossed
4/22/15  
Engrossed
4/22/15  
Refer
4/27/15  
Refer
4/27/15  
Report Pass
5/11/15  
Report Pass
5/11/15  
Enrolled
5/20/15  
Enrolled
5/20/15  
Chaptered
5/29/15  
Chaptered
5/29/15  
Passed
5/29/15  

Caption

Names the dam and spillway at Bayou D'Arbonne Lake. (8/1/15)

Impact

The enactment of SB 215 does not fundamentally alter existing state laws or policies but serves as a symbolic gesture underlining the significance of the infrastructure named in honor of an individual. While more ceremonial than transformative, such legislation may foster community pride and recognition of local history within the context of state infrastructure projects. Investments in signage not only affirm the state’s commitment to honoring its history but also play a role in promoting tourism and public awareness of the state's water resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 215, introduced by Senator Walsworth, is a legislative act that officially designates the dam and spillway at Bayou D'Arbonne Lake as the 'T.T. Fields Dam and Spillway.' This naming serves to honor T.T. Fields and may reflect the importance of historical recognition in local infrastructure. The bill not only enacts this designation but also directs the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to erect and maintain appropriate signage indicating the name, ensuring that the recognition is publicly visible.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 215 appears to be positive, particularly among those who value historical recognition and local memory. The absence of opposition during the voting process suggests a consensus among legislators regarding the importance of commemorating figures like T.T. Fields in public infrastructure. Supporters likely view the bill as a straightforward and non-controversial means to enhance local historiography.

Contention

While SB 215 does not present substantial points of contention, it does spotlight the ongoing conversation about how infrastructure is named and preserved in the state. Naming structures after individuals can always lead to discussions around whose histories are recognized and the criteria for such honors. In this case, the bill passed unanimously, indicating that the naming was not accompanied by significant debate or opposition, but it can still provoke thoughts about the implications of memorializing historic figures in state projects.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.