Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB228

Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  

Caption

Establishes a baseline limit on all claims against state taxes for industrial tax equalization exemptions filed during a fiscal year on a first-come, first-served basis and gives claims above the amount priority in the next fiscal year. (gov sig)

Impact

The implementation of SB 228 is poised to significantly affect state tax laws regarding industrial tax exemptions. It retains existing provisions for exemptions while introducing a controlled framework that limits claims annually and prioritizes disallowed claims in subsequent fiscal years. The bill is intended to curtail uncontrolled growth in tax exemptions that might lead to substantial financial implications for the state, addressing concerns about fiscal responsibility while still promoting industrial growth. By setting a definitive termination for the program in June 2021, the legislation aims to force a review of its effectiveness and adjust future policies in alignment with economic developments.

Summary

Senate Bill 228, introduced by Senator Donahue during the 2015 Regular Session, aims to revamp industrial tax equalization exemptions within Louisiana. The bill proposes a cap of nine million dollars on the total amount of exemptions allowed for manufacturing establishments, headquarters, and warehousing and distribution facilities in a given fiscal year, effective from FY 2015-16. This change seeks to level the playing field between Louisiana and competing states to retain and attract businesses by providing predictable tax exemptions on a first-come, first-served basis. By establishing this cap based on historical claims within a five-year period, the bill intends to create a more structured exemption program while limiting the potential for excessive claims that could burden the state budget.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment surrounding SB 228 seems predominantly supportive among proponents of fiscal responsibility and economic development. Supporters argue that a structured cap can provide stability and predictability for state finances, while also encouraging businesses to establish or expand their operations within Louisiana. Conversely, opponents may voice concerns regarding the limitations placed on the exemptions, fearing that the capped amounts might deter some companies from considering Louisiana as a competitive location for their enterprises. This division illustrates the ongoing tension between economic growth initiatives and budgetary constraints.

Contention

Several points of contention surrounding SB 228 might arise from its implications for local businesses and economic fairness. Critics could challenge the effectiveness of setting a cap, arguing that it may disproportionately impact smaller firms or startups that could benefit from more substantial tax exemptions. Furthermore, there could be debates regarding the criteria and processes by which exemptions are reviewed, as the bill outlines procedures involving the Board of Commerce and Industry and the Department of Revenue. There is potential for contention over the practical outcomes of the bill, particularly concerning how businesses react to the cap and whether it leads to unanticipated consequences in business decisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1369

Buy Clean California Act: eligible materials: product-specific global warming potential emissions.

OK SB586

Oklahoma Quality Jobs Program Act; modifying definition to establish certain relationship between employer and leased or contracted employee. Effective date.

CA AB1068

Prison Industry Authority: private employer: pilot program.

CA AB1045

Driver’s licenses: bone marrow and blood stem cell registry.

CA AB458

Vehicle registration.

CA AB2959

Solid waste: byproducts from the processing of food or beverages.

CA AB1457

Regional business training center network: pilot project.

MS HB378

Mississippi Development Authority; require to conduct review of infrastructures in counties with high rates of poverty.