SLS 15RS-271 ENGROSSED
2015 Regular Session
SENATE BILL NO. 267
BY SENATOR CLAITOR
Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana.
STUDENTS. Provides relative to charter school funding. (gov sig)
1 AN ACT
2 To amend and reenact R.S. 17:3991(B)(1)(a)(i) and (b), the introductory paragraph of R.S.
3 17:3995(A)(1), and R.S. 17:3995(A)(1)(a), and to repeal R.S. 17:3995(A)(3), relative
4 to charter schools; to provide relative to charter school funding and the determination
5 of the per-pupil amount received by certain charter schools; and to provide for
6 related matters.
7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
8 Section 1. R.S. 17:3991(B)(1)(a)(i) and (b), the introductory paragraph of R.S.
9 17:3995(A)(1), and R.S. 17:3995(A)(1)(a) are hereby amended and reenacted to read as
10 follows:
11 §3991. Charter schools; requirements; limitations; renewal; amendment; revocation
12 * * *
13 B. Each proposed charter shall contain or make provision for the following:
14 (1)(a)(i) That for Type 1 and Type 2 charter schools created as new schools,
15 the percentage of the total number of pupils enrolled in the charter school based on
16 the October first pupil membership who are at-risk, in the manner provided in R.S.
17 17:3973(1)(a), shall be equal to not less than eighty-five percent of the average
Page 1 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 267
SLS 15RS-271 ENGROSSED
1 percentage of pupils enrolled in the local public school districts from which the
2 charter school enrolls its students who are eligible to participate in the federal free
3 and reduced lunch program or who have been identified as a student with an
4 exceptionality as defined in R.S. 17:1942, not including gifted and talented. The
5 remaining number of pupils enrolled in the charter school which would be required
6 to have the same percentage of at-risk pupils as the percentage of pupils in the
7 district who are eligible to participate in the federal free and reduced cost lunch
8 program or who have been identified as a student with an exceptionality as
9 defined in R.S. 17:1942, not including gifted and talented, may be comprised of
10 pupils who are at-risk as is otherwise provided in R.S. 17:3973(1). For the purposes
11 of fulfilling the provisions of this Section, the at-risk percentage for the city or parish
12 school system shall remain fixed during the term of the approved charter at the
13 percentage which existed during the school year that the charter proposal was
14 approved, unless otherwise specified in the charter that the charter school will reflect
15 the current year's at-risk percentage.
16 * * *
17 (b)(i) That for Type 2 charter schools created as a result of a conversion,
18 Type 3 and Type 4 charter schools, the percentage of the total number of pupils
19 enrolled in the charter school based on the October first pupil membership who are
20 at-risk, in the manner provided in R.S. 17:3973(1)(a), unless otherwise agreed to as
21 part of the charter agreement, by the chartering authority, shall be equal to not less
22 than the percentage of the total of pupils enrolled in the school in the school year
23 prior to the establishment of the charter school that were eligible to participate in the
24 federal free and reduced cost lunch program or were identified as a student with
25 an exceptionality as defined in R.S. 17:1942, not including gifted and talented.
26 (ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of Item (i) of this Subparagraph, that for
27 Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4 charter schools in Richland Parish, the percentage of the
28 total number of pupils enrolled in the charter school based on the October first pupil
29 membership who are at risk, in the manner provided in R.S. 17:3973(1)(a), shall be,
Page 2 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 267
SLS 15RS-271 ENGROSSED
1 as near as practicable, not more than the percentage of the total number of pupils
2 enrolled in the public elementary and secondary schools and in the state-approved
3 nonpublic elementary and secondary schools located in the local public school
4 district in which the charter school is located who are eligible to participate in the
5 federal free and reduced lunch program or who have been identified as a student
6 with an exceptionality as defined in R.S. 17:1942, not including gifted and
7 talented. However, in no case shall the initial enrollment of such a school nor the
8 cohort of students enrolled for each new school year have, as near as practicable,
9 fewer than fifty percent students who are at risk in the manner provided in R.S.
10 17:3973(1)(a).
11 * * *
12 §3995. Charter school funding
13 A.(1) For the purpose of funding, a Type 1, Type 3, Type 3B, and Type 4
14 charter school shall be considered an approved public school of the local school
15 board entering into the charter agreement and shall receive a per pupil amount each
16 year from the local school board based on the October first membership count of the
17 charter school. Type 1B and Type 2 charter schools shall receive a per pupil amount
18 each year authorized by the state board each year as provided in the approved
19 minimum foundation program approved formula. The per pupil amount provided to
20 a Type 1, 1B, 2, 3, 3B, or 4 charter school shall be computed annually and shall be
21 equal to no less than the per pupil amount provided through the minimum
22 foundation program formula, determined by the allocation weights in the
23 formula based upon special student characteristics or needs, received by the
24 school district in which the charter school is located student resides from the
25 following sources based on the district's October first membership count:
26 (a) The state-funded per pupil allocation, based upon the weighted student
27 membership count, received by the district pursuant to the most recent legislatively
28 approved minimum foundation program formula resolution, including all levels and
29 allocation weights based upon special student characteristics or needs as
Page 3 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 267
SLS 15RS-271 ENGROSSED
1 provided in the formula.
2 * * *
3 Section 2. R.S. 17:3995(A)(3) is hereby repealed.
4 Section 3. This Act shall become effective upon signature by the governor or, if not
5 signed by the governor, upon expiration of the time for bills to become law without signature
6 by the governor, as provided by Article III, Section 18 of the Constitution of Louisiana. If
7 vetoed by the governor and subsequently approved by the legislature, this Act shall become
8 effective on the day following such approval.
The original instrument and the following digest, which constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument, were prepared by Jeanne C. Johnston.
DIGEST
SB 267 Engrossed 2015 Regular Session Claitor
Charter School Enrollment of At-Risk Pupils
Present law (R.S. 17:3973(1)) defines "at-risk pupil" as any pupil about whom at least one
of the following is true:
(1)Is eligible to participate in the federal free or reduced lunch program.
(2)Is under age 20 and withdrawn from school prior to graduation for not less than one
semester.
(3)Is under age 20 and has failed to achieve the required score on any portion of the
examination required for high school graduation.
(4)Is in the eighth grade or below and is reading two or more grade levels below grade
level as determined by one or more of the tests required pursuant to the state
accountability system.
(5)Has been identified as a student with an exceptionality as defined in R.S. 17:1942,
not including gifted and talented.
(6)Is the mother or father of a child.
Present law (R.S. 17:1942(B)) defines "student with an exceptionality" as a student with a
disability, who is evaluated according to state and federal regulation or policy and is deemed
to have a mental disability, hearing impairment (including deafness), multiple disabilities,
deaf-blindness, speech or language impairment, visual impairment (including blindness),
emotional disturbance, orthopedic impairment, other health impairment, specific learning
disability, traumatic brain injury, autism, or as deemed to be gifted or talented, and as a
result requires special education and related services.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law (R.S. 17:399B)(1)(a)(i) and (b)) provide as follows relative to charter school
enrollment of at-risk pupils:
Page 4 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 267
SLS 15RS-271 ENGROSSED
(1)For Type 1 and Type 2 charter schools created as new schools, the percentage of the
total number of at-risk pupils (by reason of eligibility to participate in the federal free
and reduced cost lunch program) enrolled in the charter school based on the October
1 pupil membership shall be equal to not less than 85% of the average percentage of
pupils enrolled in the local public school districts from which the charter school
enrolls its students who are eligible to participate in the federal free and reduced cost
lunch program. Provides that the remaining number of pupils enrolled in the charter
school which would be required to have the same percentage of at-risk pupils as the
percentage of pupils in the district who are eligible to participate in the federal free
and reduced cost lunch program may be comprised of pupils who are otherwise at
risk as defined in present law.
(2)For Type 2 charter schools created as the result of a conversion, Type 3, and Type
4 charter schools, the percentage of the total number of at-risk pupils (by reason of
eligibility to participate in the federal free and reduced cost lunch program) enrolled
in the charter school based on the October 1 pupil membership (unless otherwise
agreed to as part of the charter agreement by the chartering authority) shall be equal
to not less than the percentage of the total of pupils enrolled in the school in the
school year prior to the establishment of the charter school that were eligible to
participate in the federal free and reduced cost lunch program.
(3)Notwithstanding the requirements of present law as delineated in (2) above, for Type
2, Type 3, and Type 4 charter schools in Richland Parish, the percentage of the total
number of pupils enrolled in the charter school based on the October 1 pupil
membership who are at-risk (by reason of eligibility to participate in the federal free
and reduced cost lunch program) shall be, as near as practicable, not more than the
percentage of the total number of pupils enrolled in the public and state approved
nonpublic schools located in the public school district in which the charter school is
located who are eligible to participate in the federal free and reduced cost lunch
program. Additionally provides that the initial enrollment of such a school, nor the
cohort of students enrolled for each new school year, have (as near as practicable)
fewer than 50% students who are at-risk by reason of eligibility to participate in the
federal free and reduced cost lunch program.
Proposed law retains present law but additionally includes students identified with an
exceptionality, other than gifted and talented, in the required enrollment percentages for all
charter schools that apply to pupils eligible to participate in the federal free and reduced
lunch program.
Charter School Funding
Present law (R.S. 17:3995(A)(1)) provides that for funding purposes, Types 1, 3, 3B, and 4
charter schools shall be considered approved public schools of the local school board
entering into the charter agreement and shall receive a per pupil amount each year from the
local school board based on the Oct. 1 membership count of the charter school. Provides
that Type 1B and Type 2 charter schools shall receive a per pupil amount each year
authorized by the state board as provided in the minimum foundation program (MFP)
formula.
Present law specifies that the per pupil amount provided to Type 1, 1B, 2, 3, and 4 charter
schools shall be computed annually and shall be equal to no less than the per pupil amount
received by the school district in which the charter school is located from the following
sources based on the district's Oct. 1 membership count:
(1)The state-funded per pupil allocation received by the district pursuant to the most
recent legislatively approved minimum foundation program (MFP) formula,
including all levels.
Page 5 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 267
SLS 15RS-271 ENGROSSED
(2)Local revenues received during the prior year by the school district from the
following sources:
(a)Sales and use taxes, less any tax collection fee paid by the school district.
(b)Ad valorem taxes, less any tax collection fee paid by the school district.
(c)Earnings from 16th section lands owned by the school district.
Relative to local revenues received during the prior year from the specified sources (see (2)
above), present law provides that such revenues shall exclude any portion which has been
specifically dedicated by the legislature or by voter approval to capital outlay and debt
service. Further provides that such exclusion shall be applicable only to a charter school
housed in a facility or facilities provided by the district in which the charter school is
located.
Relative to local revenues received during the prior year from the specified sources (see (2)
above), present law additionally provides that such revenues received by the Orleans Parish
School Board also shall exclude certain other amounts.
Proposed law retains present law, but specifies that the per pupil amount provided to Type
1, 1B, 2, 3, and 4 charter schools shall be equal to the per pupil amount provided through the
MFP formula determined by the allocation weights in the formula based upon special student
characteristics or needs. Further specifies that the per pupil amount provided to such charter
schools shall be the per pupil amount received by the school district in which the student
resides instead of the district in which the charter school is located.
Proposed law retains present law as delineated in (1) above, but specifies that the state-
funded per pupil allocation used for computing the per pupil amount for charter schools will
be based upon the weighted student membership count received by the district pursuant to
the most recent legislatively approved MFP formula including all levels and allocation
weights based upon special student characteristics or needs as provided in the formula.
Present law (R.S. 17:3995(A)(3)) requires a district with one or more Type 3B charter
schools to distribute MFP funds to each Type 1, 3, 3B, and 4 charter school using the
weighted allocations provided for in the most recently adopted MFP formula, but exempts
the school board in a parish that contains a municipality of 300,000 or more persons from
using this weighted funding distribution requirement until the 2018-2019 fiscal year for Type
1 and Type 3 charter schools in operation prior to the 2013-2014 school year. Specifies that
until that time, these schools shall be funded as provided in present law. Further specifies
that for all other Type 1, 3, and 4 charter schools in such a parish, the school board may
request the use of a differentiated distribution methodology to be approved by the state Dept.
of Education prior to implementation.
Proposed law deletes these provisions.
Effective upon signature of the governor or lapse of time for gubernatorial action.
(Amends R.S. 17:3991(B)(1)(a)(i) and (b), 3995(A)(1)(intro para) and R.S. 17:3995
(A)(1)(a); repeals R.S. 17:3995(A)(3)).
Page 6 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions.