Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB48

Introduced
3/27/15  
Introduced
3/27/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/27/15  
Report Pass
4/27/15  
Engrossed
4/30/15  
Engrossed
4/30/15  
Refer
5/4/15  
Refer
5/4/15  
Report Pass
5/20/15  
Report Pass
5/20/15  
Enrolled
6/4/15  
Enrolled
6/4/15  
Vetoed
6/19/15  

Caption

Provides relative to the minimum ACT score for TOPS eligibility and TOPS award amounts. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly impact state laws governing educational financial assistance, particularly in regard to the criteria for receiving TOPS awards. The new provisions would ensure that the award amounts reflect tuition rates for public colleges and universities, subsequently tightening the eligibility criteria based on academic readiness as measured by standardized tests. This could potentially improve the overall quality of students eligible for these awards by aligning financial support with academic performance metrics.

Summary

Senate Bill 48 aims to amend the existing provisions for eligibility and award amounts under the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill addresses the minimum American College Test (ACT) score required for students to qualify for TOPS awards. The proposed changes stipulate that students must achieve a composite ACT score equal to or higher than the state's average score from the previous year. The bill also sets forth the amounts donated toward various educational awards granted to eligible students attending in-state colleges and universities, enhancing the financial support for students pursuing postsecondary education.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards SB 48 appears to be cautiously optimistic among lawmakers focused on education. Supporters believe that enhancing eligibility criteria will incentivize higher academic performance among high school students, leading to better prepared college entrants. However, there are concerns from critics who argue that the stringent ACT score requirements may inadvertently limit access for capable students who may not perform well on standardized tests yet would benefit from the financial aid provided by TOPS.

Contention

A notable point of contention stems from the balancing act between maintaining fiscal responsibility within educational funding and ensuring equitable access to resources for all students. Some educators and advocates are worried that a heightened focus on standardized test scores as a criterion for scholarships could disadvantage students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds who may have fewer resources for test preparation. This debate highlights underlying issues related to educational equity and the effectiveness of standardized testing as a measure of a student's readiness for higher education.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB69

State of emergency: termination after 60 days: extension by the Legislature.

CA AB2902

State of emergency: termination after 30 days: extension by the Legislature.

CA SB417

California Victim Compensation Board: claim.

CA SB1098

Passenger and freight rail: LOSSAN Rail Corridor.

CA AB2701

Public elementary and secondary schools: schoolsite councils.

CA SB39

Suspension and allocation of judgeships.

CA AB1279

California Conservation Corps: contracts: community conservation corps.

NJ A5267

Requires BPU to procure and incentivize transmission-scale energy storage.