Requests the State Licensing Board for Contractors and the Department of Health and Hospitals, office of public health, to study the lack of availability of inspectors to timely complete inspections involved in construction projects.
SCR128 aims to address the concerns raised regarding the apparent reduction in inspector availability, which has significant implications for construction projects statewide. By commissioning a study, the resolution seeks to identify barriers or shortcomings in the current inspection process. If timely inspections are not conducted, it may lead to delays in construction schedules, potentially impacting safety standards and public health outcomes. The proposed study could identify solutions to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of these inspections, thus ensuring better compliance with safety regulations.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 128 (SCR128) urges and requests the State Licensing Board for Contractors and the Department of Health and Hospitals, office of public health, to conduct a study on the availability of state inspectors who are responsible for performing timely inspections on construction projects. The resolution highlights the importance of these inspections in maintaining reasonable building standards that align with public health, safety, and welfare. The resolution requests a report on this issue to be presented to the legislature prior to the 2016 Regular Session.
The sentiment surrounding SCR128 indicates a consensus on the necessity for timely construction inspections, especially among those who prioritize public safety and health. As construction projects become more complex, stakeholders agree that having sufficient inspectors is critical to uphold standards. However, there may be contention about the responsibilities of the relevant departments and whether state resources are adequately allocated to support an increased number of inspections, reflecting a need for better inter-agency coordination.
While SCR128 does not propose immediate legislative changes, its passage would set in motion a review that could lead to significant recommendations for policy changes in the future. Some stakeholders may view this resolution as a step towards acknowledging existing gaps in the inspection process, while others could argue that without immediate action, concerns around public safety and efficient construction practices will continue to persist. Overall, the resolution hints at broader discussions on resource allocation within state agencies and how these impact construction timelines and safety standards.