Louisiana Senate Bill SCR99

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/13/15
• Refer: 5/14/15

Caption

Requires each organizational session include fiscal training for all legislators.

Impact

The primary impact of SCR99 involves improving the legislative body's understanding of fiscal responsibility and budgeting. This resolution is expected to facilitate better decision-making among lawmakers, as they will be better informed about the state's financial standing and the fiscal implications of their policy choices. By ensuring that every legislator participates in this training, the resolution seeks to create a more fiscally responsible legislative environment that encourages thoughtful and informed legislation.

Summary

SCR99 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that aims to enhance the fiscal competency of legislators in Louisiana by mandating fiscal training during organizational sessions. The proposed rule, Joint Rule 21, requires that all members of the Senate and House of Representatives engage in training that covers essential fiscal matters, including various sources of income for the state's budget and constitutionally dedicated funds. By introducing this training, the resolution seeks to equip legislators with the knowledge necessary to navigate complex financial issues effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR99 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among those who advocate for greater fiscal responsibility in government. Supporters argue that this training is critical for fostering a well-informed legislature capable of making wise budgetary decisions. However, there may be concerns among some legislators regarding the imposition of mandatory training, with potential implications for legislative efficiency during session periods. Nonetheless, the overarching sentiment is that enhanced fiscal knowledge will ultimately benefit legislative processes.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for the principles behind SCR99, discussions may reveal concerns regarding the implementation of such training, including its scheduling and potential impact on legislative time. Critics may argue that mandating training could slow down the legislative process. Additionally, there may be discussions surrounding the content and delivery method of the training, emphasizing the need for it to be pragmatic and effective in equipping legislators with necessary fiscal tools.