Requests DHH to create a study committee and to report to the Senate on provider issues regarding the provision of home-based care and services.
The formation of this study committee is anticipated to lead to significant legislative and administrative recommendations aimed at improving the long-term care system in Louisiana. By focusing on enhancing support for family caregivers and in-home service providers, the committee could help shift resources and attention towards a model of care that not only aids the elderly in living independently but is also economically sustainable compared to institutional care.
Senate Resolution No. 191 urges the Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH) to establish a study committee focused on family caregiving and long-term supports and services for aging individuals in Louisiana. With the aging population projected to exceed 126,000 by 2030, there is a growing need for effective support for elderly individuals who prefer to remain in their homes. The resolution highlights that most seniors receiving assistance rely on unpaid caregivers, thus establishing the necessity for strategies to support these individuals and the home care workforce.
General sentiment around SR191 appears supportive, with recognition of the vital role that caregivers and home health service providers play in the system. There is consensus on the importance of addressing the challenges faced by both family caregivers and in-home service providers. However, any conflicting views among stakeholders may emerge as the committee investigates the best practices and potential changes within the existing care framework.
One area of contention may arise from the review of the current limitations and inefficiencies in providing long-term services and supports. The resolution points towards the necessity of exploring the issues that have led to the reduction of service rates and the challenges of retaining a qualified workforce in the sector. Concerns about the adequacy of compensation for service providers and the need to address waiting lists for essential services may lead to debates on funding and resource allocation.