Designates the week of November 9 through 16, 2015, as "School Psychologist Week".
The resolution is intended to acknowledge the contributions of school psychologists within educational settings, which are pivotal for both general and special education. It seeks to promote an understanding of how school psychologists help eliminate barriers to learning and support academic success among students. This formal recognition can encourage schools and communities to engage more actively with school psychology services, thereby potentially enhancing the educational experience for students across the state.
Senate Resolution 4, introduced by Senator Morrish, designates the week of November 9 through 16, 2015, as 'School Psychologist Week.' The resolution highlights the important role that school psychologists play in the educational system, emphasizing their extensive qualifications in assessment, counseling, crisis response, and their knowledge of legal and educational frameworks. By recognizing this week, the resolution aims to enhance awareness about the services provided by school psychologists and their contributions to maintaining an effective learning environment for students.
The sentiment surrounding SR4 is largely positive, as it aims to honor educational professionals who have daily impacts on the lives of students. The designation of a specific week raises awareness and appreciation for the contributions of school psychologists, which is likely to be well-received by educators, administrators, and parents alike. There are no notable points of contention observed in the discussions related to this resolution, indicating widespread support for the acknowledgment of school psychologists.
Since SR4 is a resolution rather than a legislative bill with regulatory power, it does not bring significant points of contention or changes to state laws. Instead, it serves as an acknowledgment of the vital role that school psychologists play rather than altering any existing statutes. Thus, the focus is on promoting recognition rather than instigating debate or controversy within the education system.