Louisiana 2016 1st Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB14

Introduced
2/12/16  
Refer
2/12/16  
Refer
2/12/16  
Refer
2/14/16  
Report Pass
2/23/16  
Report Pass
2/23/16  
Engrossed
3/3/16  
Engrossed
3/3/16  
Report Pass
3/4/16  
Report Pass
3/4/16  
Enrolled
3/6/16  
Enrolled
3/6/16  
Chaptered
3/8/16  
Chaptered
3/8/16  
Passed
3/8/16  

Caption

Levies an additional tax on cigarettes (Item #4) (EN +$46,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 14 is poised to significantly impact state laws concerning tobacco taxation. With an increased taxation rate, the bill is expected to generate an estimated $46 million in additional general fund revenue. These funds could be allocated towards various state programs, including those aimed at healthcare and education. The change also aligns with broader public health goals that aim to reduce smoking rates and the associated healthcare costs over time.

Summary

House Bill 14 concerns the imposition of an additional tax on the sale of cigarettes in Louisiana. Specifically, it enacts a new tax rate of one and two-twentieths cents per cigarette, augmenting the existing tax framework. The intent behind this legislation is to bolster state revenue while potentially curbing cigarette consumption by raising the cost of tobacco products—an approach frequently adopted by lawmakers seeking to improve public health outcomes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 14 appears largely supportive among public health advocates and state budget proponents, who view the increased tax as a necessary measure to fund vital programs and discourage smoking. However, opposition voices primarily from the tobacco industry and some consumer advocacy groups have raised concerns regarding the financial burden placed on consumers and the potential for unintended consequences, such as incentivizing black market sales of cigarettes.

Contention

Despite the overall support for the bill, notable contention exists primarily surrounding its economic implications. Critics argue that increased taxes on tobacco products disproportionately affect low-income individuals, who may rely on these products. Additionally, there are concerns about the effectiveness of tax increases in actually reducing smoking rates, as some studies suggest that higher prices may not deter all smokers. The debate underscores a balancing act between generating state revenue and protecting vulnerable populations from excessive financial strain.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.