Louisiana 2016 1st Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB51

Introduced
2/14/16  

Caption

Reduces the rates and adjusts the brackets for purposes of calculating individual income tax and provides relative to certain deductions (Items #3 and 19) (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)

Impact

If enacted, HB 51 would have immediate implications for taxpayers beginning January 1, 2017. Individuals with taxable income will benefit from reduced rates, which could increase disposable income for many residents. However, the repeal of the excess federal itemized personal deductions will mean that some taxpayers may face higher effective tax rates than before, depending on their specific financial situations. Overall, the bill attempts to simplify the state's income tax calculation process while reducing tax liabilities for lower-income earners.

Summary

House Bill 51, submitted by Representative Abramson, aims to reduce individual income tax rates and adjust the corresponding tax brackets. Specifically, the bill proposes to lower the tax rates across all income brackets, with the most significant reduction being from 2% to 1% for the first $12,500 of net income. Additionally, it seeks to repeal the deduction for excess federal itemized personal deductions, impacting how taxpayers can calculate their state income tax obligations. This legislation constitutes a significant shift in state tax policy aimed at easing the tax burden on individuals in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 51 appears to be generally positive among proponents who view the tax rate reduction as a necessary step towards improving the financial situation of taxpayers. Advocacy for lower taxes resonates well with various voter demographics, including middle and lower-income individuals. However, there are concerns from some legislators and constituents about the potential loss of tax deductions and what it could mean for specific groups who traditionally benefit from itemized deductions.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the elimination of the deduction for excess federal itemized personal deductions, which could disproportionately affect taxpayers who itemize their deductions significantly. Opponents of this aspect of the bill argue that it could lead to higher taxes for some individuals, especially those residing in areas with higher living costs or those with elevated medical expenses. The debate centers around the balance between tax simplification and ensuring fairness in the tax system, with advocates and critics highlighting differing potential outcomes from the bill's provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.