Repeals the state income tax deduction for federal income taxes paid for purposes of calculating corporate income taxes (Item #17) (EN +$22,000,000 GF RV See Note)
The repeal of the federal income tax deduction for purposes of calculating corporate income taxes means that corporations will pay state taxes on a broader base of their income. Proponents argue that this measure will lead to an increase in state revenue, contributing to potential enhancements in public services and infrastructure. However, this change may also lead to higher effective tax rates for businesses operating in Louisiana, which might discourage new business investments or expansion for existing companies within the state.
House Bill 95 amends existing Louisiana tax laws by repealing the deductibility of federal income taxes for corporations in calculating their state corporate income tax liabilities. This change is aimed at increasing state revenue by broadening the tax base, as it effectively removes a significant deduction that corporations previously utilized. The bill also provides for alterations in the computation of corporate net income and ensures that the new rules apply to all taxable periods beginning January 1, 2017.
The sentiment around HB 95 appears to be mixed among stakeholders. Supporters, particularly from the legislative majority, believe that the bill's passage represents a necessary step toward fiscal responsibility and fortifying state funding. In contrast, opponents, including various business groups, express concerns that the removal of this tax deduction could hinder economic growth, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises which might be more adversely affected by this increased tax burden.
Notable points of contention include discussions on the fairness of the tax system and its impact on business competitiveness. Critics of the repeal argue that it disproportionately affects certain industries and could position Louisiana unfavorably compared with neighboring states that might offer more favorable tax conditions. Advocates of the bill counter that the removal of the deduction is a step towards simplifying the tax code and making funding for essential services more stable and predictable.