Resolves that a committee of five members be appointed to act with a similar House committee to notify the governor that the legislature has convened and organized and is prepared to receive his communications.
The implications of SR2 extend primarily to the procedural workings of the Louisiana legislature. By establishing a formal committee to engage with the governor, the resolution reinforces the communication channels between the executive and legislative branches. This is critical for ensuring that legislative activities align with the governor's agenda and facilitate effective governance during the session.
Senate Resolution No. 2 (SR2), introduced by Senator Long during the 2016 First Extraordinary Session, serves a procedural purpose in the organization of the legislative assembly. The resolution calls for the appointment of a committee of five members from the Senate, which would work alongside a similar committee from the House of Representatives. This committee's role is to formally notify the governor that the legislature has convened and is prepared to receive communications from him pertaining to the session.
The sentiment surrounding SR2 is generally neutral, as it pertains mainly to legislative procedure rather than controversial policy matters. Given the normative nature of such resolutions, they typically garner bipartisan support as they help maintain the proper functioning of government institutions. However, as with any resolution or bill, some lawmakers may express concerns about the transparency and efficiency of the processes involved.
While SR2 itself does not present substantial points of contention, it exemplifies the ongoing dynamics between the legislative and executive branches. Critics of such procedural resolutions might argue that they can lead to an environment where the executive branch's influence is overly pronounced during legislative sessions. Nevertheless, such concerns are more reflective of larger debates on legislative autonomy and executive power within the state rather than specific disagreements about SR2.