Louisiana House Bill HB1142

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/18/16
• Engrossed: 4/27/16
• Refer: 4/28/16
• Report Pass: 5/25/16
• Enrolled: 6/1/16
• Chaptered: 6/9/16
• Passed: 6/9/16

Caption

Provides for unemployment compensation for military spouses who resign employment to relocate pursuant to a permanent change of station order (EN INCREASE OF EX See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 1142 would change the dynamics of the unemployment compensation system in Louisiana. It introduces an exception to the general rule that negates benefits eligibility when an employee voluntarily resigns. Under this new regulation, employers would not have the costs associated with these benefits charged against their experience ratings, which generally affects their unemployment insurance rates. Instead, the costs would be treated as a social charge to all employers, redistributing the financial burden associated with these benefits.

Summary

House Bill 1142 aims to amend provisions related to unemployment compensation, specifically targeting military spouses who may have to resign from their jobs to relocate due to a permanent change of station order. The bill stipulates that such resignations should not be considered a disqualifying separation from employment. This provision is intended to support military families during the transition that comes with relocation, ensuring that spouses can receive unemployment benefits without penalty if they leave their jobs for this reason. By providing this exception, HB 1142 seeks to alleviate some of the financial burdens military families might face during such moves.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1142 appears to be largely positive, especially among legislators and advocates for military families. Supporters see this as a necessary step in recognizing and accommodating the unique challenges faced by military families. There is a general consensus that the legislation is a form of support for those who serve in the military and their spouses, fostering a sense of community and uplighting the military's contribution to society. Critics may argue about the implications of additional charges on all employers and the fair allocation of costs, but these sentiments are less pronounced compared to the supporting views.

Contention

Although the legislative discussions do not prominently highlight significant contention, there could be concerns raised regarding how the social charge will impact employers across Louisiana. Critics may express apprehensions about the long-term effects of such a measure on the unemployment insurance system. Discussions may also revolve around how employers will manage the financial implications of this change, especially small businesses, which may already be financially burdened. However, overall, the bill seems well-received with minimal opposition noted during debates.