Prohibits use of an unmanned aircraft system to conduct surveillance or collect information about a school, school premises, or correctional facilities
Impact
The enactment of HB 19 will introduce specific legal boundaries regarding the operation of unmanned aircraft systems over designated facilities. By clarifying the definitions and penalties associated with unauthorized surveillance, the bill reaffirms the state's commitment to protecting vulnerable populations, particularly children and individuals in correctional settings. Violations of the law will incur both civil and criminal penalties, including fines and potential imprisonment, thereby establishing a deterrent against unauthorized drone activities.
Summary
House Bill 19 aims to enhance the privacy and security of schools and correctional facilities by prohibiting the use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for surveillance or information gathering without explicit consent. The legislation defines unlawful use to include actions such as photographing or recording these facilities from the air, establishing clear parameters for permissible surveillance activities. This reflects a growing concern about privacy and the potential misuse of drone technology in sensitive environments such as schools and prisons.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 19 appears largely positive among legislators who prioritize community safety and privacy rights. Many supporters view the legislation as a necessary step in adapting to advancements in technology that pose new risks to personal privacy. However, there is also a nuanced concern regarding the implications for legitimate uses of drone technology, particularly in education and law enforcement contexts, which has led to some discussions about balancing security and technological innovation.
Contention
Notable points of contention during discussions of HB 19 included the implications for law enforcement and educational institutions that may wish to utilize drones for legitimate purposes, such as surveillance for student safety and facility maintenance. There were concerns over how the bill's language may restrict lawful activities while attempting to prevent misuse. Advocacy for amendments to clarify these intentions and enhance the bill's focus on both safety and the responsible use of technology indicates a significant ongoing dialogue regarding the balance between security and innovation.
Adds federal and state military installations and facilities to the locations over which the use of an unmanned aircraft system is prohibited. (8/1/25)