Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB214

Introduced
3/1/16  
Introduced
3/1/16  
Refer
3/1/16  
Refer
3/1/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Engrossed
3/21/16  
Engrossed
3/21/16  
Refer
3/22/16  
Report Pass
4/25/16  
Enrolled
5/10/16  
Enrolled
5/10/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  

Caption

Authorizes the sale of certain property in Rapides Parish

Impact

The enactment of HB 214 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws governing the transfer and management of public lands. By allowing the state to convey all or part of a tract of land to a nonprofit organization, the bill reflects a movement toward leveraging state assets for community and institutional benefit. This could set a precedent for future property transfers, shaping how similar transactions are handled within Louisiana, especially in relation to organizations serving public interests.

Summary

House Bill 214 seeks to authorize the transfer of specific state property located in Rapides Parish, Louisiana, to the Diocese of Alexandria, which is a nonprofit organization. The bill stipulates the conditions under which this transfer can take place, explicitly excluding mineral rights from the transaction. The legislation is aimed at facilitating the disposition of state land while ensuring that any agreements or covenants related to the transfer are in line with the appraised value of the property, thereby promoting administrative efficiency in state property management.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 214 appears to be largely positive among its supporters who view the bill as a means to support local institutions such as the Diocese of Alexandria. The transfer is seen as beneficial for community engagement and development. Nonetheless, potential concerns may arise regarding public transparency and the implications of transferring state property to private entities, which could prompt discussions on the appropriateness of such transactions in the future.

Contention

Although no formal opposition has been documented in the available discussions or voting records, the inclusion of provisions regarding mineral rights might raise questions about land use and environmental considerations. Stakeholders may argue over the implications of excluding mineral rights in the transfer process, especially if the land has potential economic value related to its subterranean resources. The focus will likely remain on ensuring that the transition serves the community's best interests while adhering to state regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.