Louisiana House Bill HB238

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Provides relative to appointment of the executive director of the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority and his responsibility to annually report to the legislature

Impact

This redefinition of the appointment process is significant in that it alters the direct reporting structure to the legislature. Previously, the executive director was solely responsible for annual reports regarding coastal projects and their progress. Under the new law, both the executive director and the executive assistant are tasked with this reporting obligation, potentially enhancing transparency and oversight regarding coastal protections and restorations efforts undertaken by the state.

Summary

House Bill 238, introduced by Representative Zeringue, amends the existing law relating to the appointment of the executive director of the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA). The bill specifies that while the executive director is appointed by the governor, he or she shall serve at the pleasure of the executive assistant for coastal activities. This change refines the hierarchy and accountability within the CPRA, reinforcing the role of the executive assistant in overseeing the director's tenure and actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 238 appears to be generally positive among supporters who see it as a crucial step towards efficient governance of coastal resources. The emphasis on accountability and structured reporting is viewed as beneficial for ensuring that the state's coastal plans are effectively implemented. However, it remains to be seen how this change will practically affect the operations of the CPRA and whether it will result in any contention or debate among policymakers about its execution.

Contention

Notably, while no major points of contention were highlighted in the legislative discussions provided, any backlash may depend on how the bill’s implementation affects the CPRA's autonomy and functioning. Stakeholders may be concerned about the potential for increased bureaucratic influence on coastal management activities. Observers will be keen to monitor whether the restructure facilitates better coastal management or leads to unintended delays and complications in project executions.