Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB254

Introduced
3/1/16  
Introduced
3/1/16  
Refer
3/1/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
4/20/16  
Report Pass
4/20/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Refer
4/28/16  
Refer
4/28/16  
Report Pass
5/10/16  
Report Pass
5/10/16  
Enrolled
5/24/16  
Enrolled
5/24/16  
Chaptered
6/2/16  
Passed
6/2/16  

Caption

Provides with respect to certain electronic tracking devices (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 254 will modify existing Louisiana laws concerning electronic surveillance and tracking devices, establishing clear penalties for unauthorized use. It will empower law enforcement agencies to conduct legitimate investigations while imposing strict guidelines to prevent misuse, thereby reinforcing public trust in law enforcement practices. The bill is designed to adapt to technological advancements concerning tracking devices, reflecting the evolving nature of surveillance technology in investigations.

Summary

House Bill 254 addresses issues relating to electronic tracking devices, particularly cellular tracking devices, and establishes regulations governing their use. The bill creates the crime of unlawful use of a cellular tracking device, prohibiting individuals from collecting or intercepting data from someone else's device without their consent. It also delineates specific conditions under which law enforcement officers may employ these devices, such as requiring a court order or the existence of exigent circumstances for immediate use. This aims to balance the investigative needs of law enforcement with the privacy rights of individuals.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 254 appears to be mixed. Supporters view it as a necessary step towards regulating emerging technologies and protecting citizens' privacy rights while facilitating law enforcement efforts. On the other hand, there are concerns from civil rights advocates regarding potential overreach and misuse of such tracking technologies, fearing that it could lead to undue surveillance of the population.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the balance between effective law enforcement and individual privacy rights. Critics argue that the bill could enable intrusive surveillance practices if not carefully monitored. Moreover, there are questions regarding the adequacy of the defined roles and responsibilities of law enforcement agents in relation to the use of tracking devices. As the bill proposes specific definitions and procedures, ensuring these provisions are adhered to may pose challenges, further complicating the debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB424

Provides with respect to cellular tracking devices (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA HB138

Creates the crime of unlawful use of a cell site simulator device and restricts lawful usage to certain law enforcement and investigative officers under certain conditions

CT HB07291

An Act Concerning The Use Of Cell Site Simulator Devices By Law Enforcement Officials To Conduct Cellular Telephone Surveillance.

HI SB2310

Relating To Harassment.

HI HB2014

Relating To Harassment.

LA HB100

Provides relative to bail bond enforcement (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

TX HB352

Relating to warrants issued to obtain cell site information through the use of a cell site simulator device and to public access to certain information relating to investigatory equipment; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB3165

Relating to warrants issued to obtain cell site information through the use of a cell site simulator device; public access to certain information relating to investigatory equipment; creating criminal offenses.