Requires the submission of redistricting plans in a specified format to the secretary of state
The implementation of HB 369 aims to standardize the submission process for redistricting plans across various local governing bodies, including parish authorities, municipal authorities, and school boards in Louisiana. By providing a clear framework for electronic submissions, the bill seeks to improve the efficiency and accuracy of redistricting data management. It is expected to facilitate better oversight and planning at the state level while streamlining local compliance processes related to redistricting.
House Bill 369, enacted during the 2016 Regular Session, introduces a requirement for local governing bodies in Louisiana to submit their redistricting plans in a designated electronic format to the Secretary of State. The bill specifies that if a local governing body develops its redistricting plan using a geographic information system, it must provide a digital shapefile reflecting the plan within ten business days following its adoption. For those unable to provide such a file, an alternative in the form of an ASCII, comma-separated block equivalency import file that details census block assignments is acceptable.
Overall, the sentiment regarding HB 369 appears to be supportive among lawmakers, as it passed unanimously with 33 votes in favor and none against in the Senate. The bill's proponents likely view it as a necessary update to enhance transparency and ensure that redistricting plans are accessible and easily manageable by the state. There is an underlying optimism that the bill will improve local governance through more organized data sharing, which is crucial during election cycles.
While there seems to be general approval for HB 369, potential contention may arise regarding the technological capacity of some local governing bodies to meet the new requirements, especially smaller entities that may lack resources for advanced geographic information systems. This concern about equity in meeting the bill's requirements could spark debates about additional support or resources needed for local governments to comply effectively, potentially impacting the timely execution of redistricting efforts.