Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB397 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

                            HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
2016 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 397
BY REPRESENTATIVES MORENO, COX, AND HUNTER
EMPLOYMENT:  Provides relative to equal pay for women
1	AN ACT
2To amend and reenact Chapter 6-A of Title 23 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950,
3 to be comprised of R.S. 23:661 through 669, relative to equal pay; to provide with
4 respect for public policy; to provide for definitions; to further prohibit pay
5 discrimination;  to provide a complaint procedure, penalties, attorney fees, and
6 damages; and to provide for related matters.
7Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
8 Section 1.  Chapter 6-A of Title 23 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950,
9comprised of R.S. 23:661 through 669, is hereby amended and reenacted to read as follows: 
10 CHAPTER 6-A.  LOUISIANA EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN ACT
11 §661.  Short title; citation
12	This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Louisiana Equal Pay
13 for Women Act".
14 §662.  Declaration of public policy
15	A.  The public policy of this state is that a woman who performs public
16 service for the state is entitled to be paid the same compensation for her service as
17 is paid to a man who performs the same kind, grade and quality of service, and a all
18 employees shall be compensated equally for work that is the same or comparable in
19 kind and quality.  No distinction in compensation may not be made because of sex.
Page 1 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
1	B.  Louisiana women earn, on average, sixty-five cents for every dollar a man
2 earns for full-time work.  This figure has decreased for three years in a row, giving
3 Louisiana the largest gender wage gap in the country.
4	C.  The pay gap is more exaggerated for women of color in Louisiana, with
5 African-American women earning forty-eight cents, and Hispanic women earning
6 fifty-three cents, for every dollar earned by white non-Hispanic men.
7	D.  Regardless of level of educational attainment and the field of
8 employment, Louisiana women earn less than men at the same level in the same
9 field.  Women’s earnings are lower than men’s in all twenty-five  listed occupational
10 fields, including those fields where women dominate.
11	E.  The gender wage gap contributes to the high poverty rate among
12 Louisiana women and children. The average woman loses about sixteen thousand
13 dollars per year to the wage gap, which adds up to a lifetime earnings loss of over six
14 hundred fifty thousand dollars.  This affects not only a woman’s earning capacity as
15 a breadwinner for the family but her long term economic security as well, limiting
16 the possibility of building assets, starting a business, or retiring with adequate
17 financial resources.
18	F.  When wages are paid unfairly, the government must bear the cost of
19 assisting with the needs of low income families, and make up for the loss in tax
20 revenue that fair, higher wages would bring.  Businesses lose due to lower
21 productivity and higher employee turnover generated in workplaces that do not have
22 fair pay practices.
23	G.  Louisiana’s laws have not been effective in combating the disparity
24 caused by discrimination and pay secrecy.  Women are not able to challenge wage
25 discrimination that they do not know exists.
26	H.  To eliminate the gender wage gap in Louisiana, the state’s equal pay
27 provisions and laws regarding wage disclosure must be improved.
Page 2 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
1 §663.  Definitions
2	As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the definitions
3 ascribed in this Section unless the context indicates otherwise:
4	(1)  "Commission" means the Louisiana Commission on Human Rights.
5	(2)  "Employee" means any female individual who is employed to work forty
6 or more hours a week and who is employed by works for the employer in return for
7 compensation.
8	(3)  "Employer" means any department, office, division, agency, commission,
9 board, committee or other organizational unit of the state or any unit of local
10 government or political subdivision, any individual, partnership, corporation,
11 association, business, trust, person, contractor, labor organization, or entity for whom
12 twenty or more employees are gainfully employed within the state.
13	(4)  "Unpaid wages" means the difference between the compensation actually
14 paid to an employee and the amount owed to the employee.
15 §664.  Prohibited acts
16	A.  No employer may discriminate against an employee on the basis of sex
17 by paying wages to an employee at a rate less than that paid within the same agency
18 to another employee of a different sex for the same or substantially similar work on
19 jobs in which the employee's performance requires that require equal or comparable
20 skill, effort, education, and responsibility and that are performed under similar 
21 involve the same or comparable working conditions including time worked in the
22 position.
23	B.  Nothing in Subsection A of this Section shall prohibit the payment of
24 different wage rates to employees when such payment is made pursuant to any of the
25 following:
26	(1)  A seniority system.
27	(2)  A merit system.
28	(3)  A system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production.
Page 3 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
1	(4)  A differential based on a bona fide factor other than sex and consistent
2 with a business necessity, including but not limited to education, training, or
3 experience, provided that both:
4	(a)  The employer demonstrates that such factor is related to the job position
5 in question.
6	(b)  No alternative employment practice would serve the same legitimate
7 business purpose without producing such a differential.
8	C.  An employer who is paying wages in violation of this Chapter may not,
9 in order to comply with this Chapter, reduce the wages of any other employee.
10	D.  It shall be unlawful for an employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the
11 exercise of, or attempt to exercise, any right provided under pursuant to this Chapter. 
12 It shall be unlawful for any employer to discriminate, retaliate, or take any adverse
13 employment action, including but not limited to termination or in any other manner
14 discriminate against any employee for inquiring about, disclosing, comparing, or
15 otherwise discussing the employee's wages or the wages of any other employee, or
16 aiding or encouraging any other employee to exercise his or her rights under
17 pursuant to this Chapter.
18	E.  It shall be unlawful for an employer subject to this Chapter to
19 discriminate, retaliate, or take any adverse employment action, including but not
20 limited to termination, against an employee because, in exercising or attempting to
21 exercise the employee's rights under pursuant to this Chapter, such the employee:
22	(1)  Has filed any complaint or has instituted or caused to be instituted any
23 proceeding to enforce the employee's rights under pursuant to this Chapter.
24	(2)  Has provided or will provide any information in connection with any
25 inquiry, hearing, or proceeding relating to any right afforded to an employee
26 pursuant to this Chapter, regardless of whether the information is related to the
27 employee's rights or the rights of another employee.
Page 4 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
1	(3)  Has testified or will testify in any inquiry, hearing, or proceeding relating
2 to any right afforded to an employee pursuant to this Chapter, regardless of whether
3 the testimony is related to the employee's rights or the rights of another employee.
4	F.  An employee's agreement to work at a rate of compensation that is less
5 than the rate to which the employee is entitled is not a defense that may be used by
6 the employer in any action against him brought pursuant to this Chapter.
7	G.  The provisions of this Chapter shall be construed to prohibit
8 discrimination in pay regardless of whether the differential in pay is intentional or
9 unintentional.
10 §665.  Complaint procedure
11	A.  An Any employee who in good faith believes that her his employer is in
12 violation of this Chapter shall submit written notice of the alleged violation to the
13 employer.  An employer who receives such written notice from an employee shall
14 have sixty days from receipt of the notice to investigate the matter and remedy any
15 violation of this Chapter discriminatory differential in pay.  If an the employer
16 remedies the violation to the satisfaction of the employee in a manner that complies
17 with the statute and does so within the time provided herein, the employee may not
18 bring any action against the employer pursuant to this Chapter except as provided in
19 Subsections B and C of this Section regarding the satisfactorily remedied complaint.
20	B.  If an the employer fails to resolve the dispute to the satisfaction of such
21 the employee within the time provided herein allotted sixty days, the employee may
22 file a complaint with the commission requesting an investigation of the complaint
23 pursuant to this Chapter, Chapter 3-A of this Title or R.S. 51:2257.
24	C.  If the commission finds evidence of discriminatory, retaliatory, or other
25 adverse employment action on the part of the employer in violation of this Chapter
26 but is unable to resolve or mediate the dispute, or fails to render a decision as to
27 regarding the dispute within one hundred eighty days from the filing of the
28 complaint, or issues a finding of no discrimination on the part of the employer, the
Page 5 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
1 employee may institute a civil suit in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court a district
2 court of competent jurisdiction.
3 §666.  Damages
4	A.(1)  An employer who violates the provisions of this Chapter shall be liable
5 to the affected employees in the amount of the employee's employee for unpaid
6 wages and reasonable attorney fees, interest, and costs.
7	(2)  In addition to the damages provided for in this Subsection, the court may
8 award the employee liquidated damages, up to the amount of any unpaid wages,
9 reinstatement of employment, promotion, or compensation for lost benefits.
10	B.  The award of monetary relief shall be limited to those violations which
11 have that occurred within a thirty-six-month period prior to the employee's written
12 notice to the employer, as required in R.S. 23:665(A).
13	C.  In cases where suit is filed in the district court, no monetary relief may
14 be awarded the employee for losses incurred between the date that the district court
15 rendered its final judgment and the date upon which all appeals of that judgment
16 have been exhausted.
17	D.  Interim earnings by the employee discriminated against shall operate to
18 reduce the monetary relief otherwise allowable under pursuant to this Chapter.
19	E.D.  Nothing in this Chapter prevents the voluntary settlement of a claim by
20 agreement of between the employer and the employee for a lesser amount than the
21 employee alleges the employee is due.
22	F.E.  An employee found by a the court to have brought a frivolous claim
23 under pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter shall may be held liable to the
24 employer or any agent of the employer who was named a defendant in the suit, or
25 both, for reasonable damages, reasonable attorney fees, and court costs incurred as
26 a result of the claim.
27 §667.  Limitation of actions
28	A.  Any action filed in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court district court to
29 recover unpaid wages or any other form of relief for a violation of this Chapter shall
Page 6 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
1 be commenced within one year of the date that an employee is becomes aware or
2 should have been aware that the employee's his employer is in violation of this
3 Chapter.
4	B. This The one-year prescriptive period shall be suspended during the
5 sixty-day period allowed to the employer by this Chapter to respond to the
6 employee's written notice, during the pendency of any administrative review, or
7 investigation of the employee's claim by the Louisiana Commission on Human
8 Rights commission or the United States Equal Employment Opportunity
9 Commission, or both.
10 §668.  Records to be kept by employers
11	An Every employer subject to this Chapter shall create and preserve records
12 reflecting of the name, sex, address, and position of each employee, and all wages
13 paid to each employee.  These records shall be preserved for a period of not less than
14 at least three years from the employee's last date of employment with the employer.
15 §669.  Supplemental application
16	This Chapter is supplemental to and is not intended to supercede any
17 provision provided for provide additional remedies to those provisions in Chapter 3-
18 A of this Title, the "Louisiana Employment Discrimination Act", which prohibits
19 discrimination based upon sex regardless of whether the employer is a state public
20 entity, a private business, or other employer.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services.  It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument.  The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent.  [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 397 Original 2016 Regular Session	Moreno
Abstract: Extends pay equality to all persons employed in the state of La.
Present law provides a statement of public policy, of which proposed law alters and
expounds upon, regarding the pay differential between men and women in La.
Present law provides that women working as public employees shall be entitled to the same
compensation as men employed as public employees.
Page 7 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
Proposed law extends present law to provide that pay equality shall apply to all persons
employed in the state.
Present law defines "employee" as a woman who works more than 40 hours a week.
Proposed law changes the definition of "employee" to mean any person in the state of La.
who performs a job for compensation.
Present law defines "employer" as an organizational unit of state government.  Proposed law
extends the definition of "employer" from an organizational unit of the state to all employers
within the state of La. that employ 20 or more persons.
Present law prohibits an employer from paying wages to an employee at a rate less than the
rate at which the employer pays wages to another employee of the opposite sex for the same
or substantially similar work within the same agency.  Proposed law removes the specific
reference to "within the same agency" and further provides that the work performed that is
eligible for equal pay may be the same or comparable to the work done by another
employee.
Present law allows exceptions for pay differentials in instances in which pay is made under
a seniority system, a merit system, a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality
of production, or a differential based on a factor other than sex as long as the system is job
related or furthers a legitimate business purpose.  Proposed law retains present law and
further allows for an exception in differentials in pay if the differential is based on a factor
other than sex and is consistent with a business necessity.
Proposed law disallows discrimination based on sex regardless of whether the discrimination
is intentional or unintentional.
Present law prohibits an employer from interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise
of, or attempted exercise of an employee's right to equal pay and his right to object and bring
action to remedy the discrimination.
Present law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory measures against an employee who
brings a complaint or who discusses his wages with another employee to discern if there
exists a discriminatory differential in wages.  Proposed law retains present law.
Present law further prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee for
encouraging a fellow employee to pursue his rights under the law. Proposed law retains
present law.
Present law sets forth a complaint procedure for suspected violations of present law.  Any
employee who believes that his employer is discriminating in compensation may provide
written notice to the employer of the violation. Upon receiving the notice, the employer is
allowed 60 days to remedy the violation.  Proposed law retains present law but requires that
the remedy be to the employee's satisfaction.
Present law provides that if the employer does not remedy the pay differential within the
allotted 60 days, the employee may bring an action against the employer with the Human
Rights Commission pursuant to present law (R.S. 51:2257).  Proposed law retains present
law and in addition to the complaint procedure set forth in present law (Title 51), also allows
for the use of the complaint procedure set forth in present law (Chapter 3-A of Title 23)
regarding discrimination in employment.
Present law provides that if the commission finds evidence of discriminatory action on the
part of the employer but fails to resolve the dispute, or fails to render a decision on the
dispute, the employee may institute a civil suit in district court. Proposed law retains present
law and limits the time period the commission is allowed to decide on the dispute to 180
days from the filing of the complaint.
Page 8 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 16RS-444	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 397
Present law requires that suits be brought in the 19
th
 JDC, which proposed law changes to
a district court of competent jurisdiction.
Present law requires the court to award damages in the amount of unpaid wages, attorney
fees, and costs if a discriminatory differential in pay is found.  Proposed law retains present
law and further mandates that interest be paid and allows the court to award additional
damages, reinstate employment, grant a promotion, or compensate the employee for lost
benefits.
Present law limits monetary relief for a violation of the law to a 36-month period prior to the
employee's written notice.  Proposed law retains present law.
Present law specifies that monetary relief cannot be awarded for losses incurred between the
time of the district court's final decision and the final determination of an appellate court. 
Proposed law deletes present law.
Present law allows interim earnings by the employee to operate to reduce the deficit owed.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law allows an employee and his employer to come to an agreement to settle the
claim for an amount less than what the employee believes he is owed.
Proposed law retains present law but requires that the agreement be voluntary.
Present law provides that if the court finds that the employee's claim is frivolous, then the
employee will be liable to his employer for damages, attorney fees, and court costs accrued
as a result of the claim.  Proposed law retains present law.
Present law provides for a one-year prescriptive period to bring claims, but provides for an
interruption of prescription during the period allotted to the employer when the employee
has given notice of a violation and during an administrative investigation of the violation.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law requires employers to make and preserve records that document names,
addresses, positions, and wages of employees and requires that the records be preserved for
at least three years from the last date of employment.  Proposed law retains present law and
further requires the sex of each employee be recorded and retained.
Present law provides that present law shall not supercede workplace discrimination law
located in other statutes.  Proposed law retains present law.
(Amends R.S. 23:661-669)
Page 9 of 9
CODING:  Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.