Louisiana House Bill HB458

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Jeffrey and Lillie Christopher, et al v. The State of La., through the DOTD, et al"

Impact

The passing of HB 458 holds significant implications for the state’s financial management and its continued obligations in legal matters. By appropriating funds from the general fund, the bill highlights how the state allocates resources to address legal judgments, reflecting accountability in governance. Furthermore, it serves as a reminder of the financial liabilities that the state faces due to legal actions and the necessity for budgeting to account for these potential costs.

Summary

House Bill 458 is a legislative measure aimed at appropriating funds from the state general fund of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2016-2017. Specifically, the bill designates a sum of $175,000 to settle a consent judgment in the case titled 'Jeffrey and Lillie Christopher, et al v. The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development'. This legislative action underscores the state's commitment to fulfill its financial obligations stemming from court rulings against it.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 458 appears to be neutral, focusing primarily on responsibility rather than contentious debate or significant political division. Given that the bill seeks to honor a legal judgment, it does not engender the same level of passionate discourse that may accompany more controversial legislation, such as those impacting policies or taxes.

Contention

While there does not seem to be overt contention surrounding the provisions of HB 458, the larger context of state appropriations for legal judgments often raises discussions about transparency and fiscal responsibility. Opponents may question the impact of such settlements on the state budget and whether they divert resources from other critical areas. However, the nature of the bill, being predominantly an appropriations measure, minimizes direct legislative confrontation.