Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit against the DOTD entitled "Jessie Bell Jones, et al. v. Christopher Ordoyne, et al."
Impact
The bill is straightforward in its intent to fulfill a financial obligation arising from a court ruling. By appropriating the necessary funds, the legislation ensures compliance with the court's judgment. Such appropriations are commonplace in state legislation, indicating a functioning judicial system and the need for the state to cover legal outcomes resulting from its actions or those of its departments. In this case, the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) is specifically mentioned as one of the parties involved in the suit.
Summary
House Bill 1298 appropriates funds from the state general fund of Louisiana to cover a consent judgment in the lawsuit titled 'Jessie Bell Jones, et al. v. Christopher Ordoyne, et al.'. The bill specifically allocates a sum of $5,000 for the payment of this judgment, which was issued in the St. Tammany Parish by the 22nd Judicial District Court. This legislative action reflects the state's obligations regarding judicial decisions.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1298 is likely neutral, primarily rooted in a fiscal responsibility to address judgments against the state. Since the bill does not introduce new policies or contentious issues and solely relates to funding a judgment, it may not have garnered extensive political contention. Legislators may view it as a necessary, albeit routine, administrative action.
Contention
While there are no indications of significant public opposition or support for this bill, it serves as a reminder of the state’s accountability regarding legal proceedings, and its requirement to uphold the judicial system's decisions. Importantly, this type of legislation highlights the interplay between state governance and the judicial system, showcasing how financial responsibilities are managed at the state level.
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "William K. Harrison, Jr. et al v. Succession of Patrick E. Vincent, et al"