Louisiana House Bill HB93

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Robin Bergeron, et al v. State of Louisiana, et al"

Impact

The passing of HB 93 will directly influence the state budget, requiring a reallocation of resources within the General Fund to ensure compliance with the court's ruling. By appropriating these funds, the state demonstrates adherence to legal commitments and reinforces the importance of upholding judicial decisions. This action underscores the ongoing fiscal responsibilities of government entities in Louisiana, particularly in how they manage funds in response to litigation outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 93 seeks to appropriate funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2010-2011, specifically a sum of $200,000 intended for the payment of a consent judgment related to the lawsuit 'Robin Bergeron, et al v. State of Louisiana, et al'. This legislative act emerges from the necessity to address financial obligations stemming from judicial decisions against the state, showcasing the state's responsibility in fulfilling court mandates.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 93 is largely procedural, as it deals with the financial obligations resulting from a legal dispute rather than initiating new policy or regulation. While there are no significant controversies reported in the discussions related to this bill, the necessity for funding appropriations can highlight larger concerns about the state’s financial management and its impacts on other funding priorities.

Contention

Though no major points of contention were highlighted specifically for HB 93 within the provided documents, the inherent nature of appropriations and budget allocations often leads to broader discussions regarding fiscal priorities. Lawmakers may contest the allocation of funds, prioritizing other areas or programs that may compete for financial resources within the same budget cycle. However, the urgency to address legal judgments typically necessitates prompt funding decisions.