Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB484

Introduced
3/3/16  
Introduced
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Engrossed
4/12/16  
Refer
4/13/16  
Report Pass
5/10/16  
Report Pass
5/10/16  
Enrolled
5/18/16  
Enrolled
5/18/16  
Chaptered
5/26/16  
Chaptered
5/26/16  
Passed
5/26/16  

Caption

Provides for the provision of cash medical support when a family receives support enforcement services

Impact

The most significant impact of HB 484 is the establishment of clear guidelines for when and how cash medical support should be mandated in child support orders. This aims to alleviate the burden on custodial parents who may struggle with medical costs while navigating child support agreements. By requiring noncustodial parents to pay cash medical support in the absence of health insurance, the law ensures that children's healthcare needs are given priority and are financially supported, even if insurance coverage is not feasible at the outset.

Summary

House Bill 484 focuses on child support provisions in Louisiana, specifically addressing the requirement for cash medical support in cases where health insurance is not readily available or affordable. The bill amends existing laws to ensure that at least one parent contributes towards medical expenses when the state provides support enforcement services. This includes provisions allowing courts to establish cash payments towards medical support that should not exceed 5% of the noncustodial parent's gross income until insurance coverage becomes available.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 484 appears largely supportive, particularly among advocates for children's rights and family welfare. Many view the bill as a necessary reform aimed at strengthening protections for children in custodial arrangements. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential financial impacts on noncustodial parents, especially those who may already be burdened with existing child support obligations. Overall, the sentiment can be described as cautiously optimistic, with most stakeholders acknowledging the need for effective medical support in child welfare.

Contention

Despite the general support, notable points of contention exist, primarily relating to the financial implications for noncustodial parents. Critics argue that setting cash medical support as a mandatory obligation could lead to increased financial strain, particularly for those who are already facing difficulties in meeting child support responsibilities. The amendments also make it clear that cash medical support is distinct from general child support orders, which could raise concerns among some parents about the fairness and potential overlap in payment obligations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.