Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB553

Introduced
3/3/16  
Introduced
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/14/16  

Caption

Designates and provides for critical areas of ground water concern

Impact

The proposed law introduces limitations on ground water withdrawals, with facilities in designated critical areas required to limit use to no more than one million gallons per day within two years of designation. It exempts agricultural, residential, domestic, and municipal uses from these limits, aiming to protect essential water supplies while managing excessive ground water extraction effectively. The involvement of the commissioner of conservation in managing these resources is central to the bill, mandating public hearings and creating a transparent process for addressing ground water concerns.

Summary

House Bill 553 seeks to address concerns related to ground water resources in Louisiana by designating specific areas as critical areas of ground water concern. The bill focuses on five parishes: East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, West Feliciana, and Pointe Coupee. It establishes regulations for ground water usage in these areas with the objective of ensuring sustainable management of this critical resource. The bill mandates that governing bodies formed to oversee these areas must include only members free from conflicts of interest and empowered to take necessary actions to prevent waste and mitigate subsidence caused by ground water withdrawal.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 553 is generally supportive among stakeholders who prioritize environmental sustainability and responsible resource management. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards safeguarding ground water resources, particularly given the pressing challenges of water sustainability in many regions. Conversely, there may be apprehensions from critics regarding potential restrictions on ground water usage by industrial or commercial entities, who might fear that such regulations could hinder economic activities.

Contention

Notable points of contention pertain to the balance between regulation and economic activity. Some stakeholders may argue that strict limitations on ground water usage could impact local industries reliant on significant water withdrawals, thus prompting concerns over job retention and economic viability in the affected regions. Additionally, the governance structure imposed by the bill, which restricts membership in oversight bodies to those free from conflicts of interest, could face scrutiny regarding the fairness and effectiveness of decision-making processes in managing shared water resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB637

False or misleading commercial disaster communication.

LA SB203

Establishes withdrawal limits on the use of groundwater. (8/1/13)

CA SB505

Property insurance.

MI HB6151

Elections: candidates; replacement of candidate for county commissioner after death; provide for and clarify. Amends secs. 194, 195 & 198 of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.194 et seq.).

IA HF463

A bill for an act relating to insurance policy terms and public policy considerations.(Formerly HSB 167.)

IA HSB167

A bill for an act relating to insurance policy terms and public policy considerations.(See HF 463.)

LA HB535

Designates and provides for critical areas of ground water concern

TX HB1402

Relating to requirements regarding the withdrawal by certain insurers from the market for certain lines of insurance.