Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB561

Introduced
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
3/17/16  
Report Pass
3/17/16  
Engrossed
3/28/16  
Engrossed
3/28/16  
Refer
3/29/16  
Refer
3/29/16  
Report Pass
5/16/16  
Report Pass
5/16/16  
Enrolled
5/23/16  
Enrolled
5/23/16  
Chaptered
5/31/16  
Chaptered
5/31/16  

Caption

Provides relative to membership in the Zachary Taylor Parkway District and Commission

Impact

The amendment impacts state laws governing the Zachary Taylor Parkway District and has potential implications for local governance, particularly concerning how members of the commission are appointed and represent their respective parishes. By refining the criteria for membership within the commission, the bill seeks to promote more effective management of resources and projects that fall within the purview of the district.

Summary

House Bill 561 addresses structural changes within the Zachary Taylor Parkway District by amending membership regulations of its governing commission. This district is comprised of several Louisiana parishes that have geographical and administrative significance. The bill aims to clarify and enhance the governance of the district, ensuring that representation is aligned with the needs and demographic changes of the area.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 561 appears to be generally positive, as it is seen as a necessary adjustment to improve the operational structure of the district. Legislative support was robust, as evidenced by a unanimous vote in favor of the bill during its final passage. This reflects a recognized need for clarity and improved governance within the commission, which is essential for responsive and accountable local administration.

Contention

While there does not seem to be significant contention surrounding the passage of HB 561, it does highlight ongoing discussions regarding governance structures at the local level. Proponents argue that the revisions will facilitate better management, while critics—though sparse—may express concerns about the implications of membership changes on local interests and representation. Overall, the bill represents a move towards adapting local governance frameworks to better meet contemporary needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.