Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB624

Introduced
3/4/16  
Introduced
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
3/24/16  
Engrossed
4/4/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Report Pass
5/3/16  
Report Pass
5/3/16  
Enrolled
5/10/16  
Enrolled
5/10/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Passed
5/19/16  

Caption

Provides with respect to the reporting of certain judicial proceedings regarding the possession of firearms

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws concerning firearm possession, particularly regarding individuals with criminal convictions. By formalizing a process for reporting specific convictions, the bill enhances the existing framework for preventing individuals who should not possess firearms from obtaining them. This is expected to improve the accuracy of background checks and contribute to public safety by ensuring that those with a history of domestic violence or other prohibitive circumstances are adequately flagged in the NICS database.

Summary

House Bill 624 aims to amend provisions related to the reporting of judicial proceedings that affect an individual's ability to possess firearms. Specifically, it mandates that city and parish clerks of court provide information about certain judicial actions to the Louisiana Supreme Court for entry into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). The bill focuses on convictions related to domestic abuse battery, which is critical in determining an individual’s eligibility to possess firearms under both state and federal law.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 624 appears supportive among legislators who prioritize firearm safety and the protection of domestic abuse victims. The reasoning behind this perspective is that enhancing the reporting process will serve to prevent gun violence and strengthen enforcement of existing laws. However, there may also be concerns about potential overreach or administrative burdens associated with the mandated reporting requirements, which could lead to some contention among stakeholders.

Contention

While there is broad bipartisan support for the intent of the bill, some points of contention may arise regarding the administrative implications for local court systems and their capacity to comply with the reporting requirements. Additionally, questions about privacy and the potential for stigmatization of individuals with certain convictions could stimulate discussion. However, the overall consensus on the importance of responsible firearm ownership and the necessity of effective background checks remains central to the ongoing debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.