Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB637

Introduced
3/4/16  
Introduced
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
3/29/16  
Report Pass
3/29/16  
Engrossed
4/6/16  
Engrossed
4/6/16  
Refer
4/7/16  
Refer
4/7/16  
Report Pass
4/27/16  
Enrolled
5/4/16  
Enrolled
5/4/16  
Chaptered
5/10/16  
Chaptered
5/10/16  
Passed
5/10/16  

Caption

Authorizes the imposition of certain fees for rental of automobiles

Impact

The introduction of HB 637 could have a significant effect on the statutory framework governing automobile rental agreements in Louisiana. By permitting the separate listing of fees, the bill aims to clarify costs associated with vehicle rentals, which may lead to a more informed consumer base and potentially foster greater competition among rental companies. However, it also obligates lessors to manage fee estimations accurately, ensuring that any excess fees collected must be adjusted in future rental agreements, which could necessitate internal operational changes for these businesses.

Summary

House Bill 637 aims to standardize the way automobile rental companies handle specific mandatory fees in rental agreements in Louisiana. The bill allows lessors to list certain charges, such as vehicle license recovery fees and airport access fees, separately in the rental agreements. This measure is intended to provide greater transparency for consumers by clearly itemizing these costs rather than incorporating them into a single rental price. The legislation seeks to enhance consumer awareness regarding what they are being charged for.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 637 appears to be positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups who favor increased transparency in rental costs. Legislators demonstrated support during voting, as indicated by the unanimous passage with no dissenting votes. This indicates a general consensus that the bill could benefit consumers by reducing hidden fees and providing clear expectations regarding rental costs.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, there may be concerns regarding the administrative burden this bill places on rental companies to accurately estimate and report mandatory fees. Additionally, while the intent is to clarify costs for consumers, there may still be criticism that such measures could lead to confusion if not appropriately enforced or understood by all parties involved. The implementation of this bill will need careful monitoring to see if it achieves its intended purpose without imposing excessive costs or burdens on lessors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.