Louisiana House Bill HB805

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 4/12/16
• Engrossed: 4/21/16
• Refer: 4/25/16
• Report Pass: 5/4/16
• Refer: 5/5/16
• Report Pass: 5/25/16
• Enrolled: 6/6/16
• Chaptered: 6/17/16
• Passed: 6/17/16

Caption

Provides relative to communication districts (EN +$14,300,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The bill's provisions will facilitate improvements in the emergency response framework by mandating that wireless service providers participate in the Next Generation 911 (NG911) system. The NG911 initiative will allow users to transmit text messages, images, and videos along with voice calls, supporting a more effective emergency response. By increasing the financial resources available to communications districts, HB805 aims to improve the reliability and responsiveness of emergency services. However, the bill would also remove some existing requirements related to the allocation of funds and oversight mechanisms for the use of service charge proceeds.

Summary

House Bill 805 amends current statutes governing communications districts in Louisiana to increase the maximum emergency telephone service charge that can be levied. The bill aims to enhance emergency services by enabling districts to collect a service charge of up to $1.25 per month per CMRS (Commercial Mobile Radio Service) connection. This change is significant as it adjusts the funding mechanism for emergency services while aligning with national standards for wireless emergency response systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB805 has been generally positive among proponents who argue that enhancing 911 services and infrastructure is crucial for ensuring public safety. Stakeholders, including local officials and emergency service providers, often support the bill's aim to modernize emergency response capabilities. However, there are concerns among some community members and advocacy groups regarding the potential for increased costs passed on to consumers through the service charge. The debate highlights the balance between securing adequate funding for emergency services and ensuring affordability for residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding HB805 include the concern that increasing service charges could disproportionately affect low-income households and the potential lack of oversight in how the collected funds are utilized. Critics argue that the changes could lead to fiscal mismanagement if adequate auditing and reporting requirements are not enforced, which could undermine public trust in how emergency service funding is managed. These debates emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in public services funded by newly levied charges.