Louisiana Senate Bill SB361

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Engrossed: 4/10/12
• Refer: 4/11/12
• Refer: 4/30/12
• Refer: 5/1/12
• Report Pass: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 6/4/12
• Chaptered: 6/7/12
• Passed: 6/7/12

Caption

Provides relative to 9-1-1 fees for the Orleans Communication District. (8/1/12) (EN +$2,728,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

By allowing the Orleans Parish Communication District to levy these fixed rates, SB 361 is expected to secure sustainable funding for 9-1-1 services. The bill intends to enhance the operational efficiency of emergency response systems in the region, which could lead to improved public safety outcomes. Additionally, the fixed charge structure aims to standardize the service fees across various service categories, benefiting both residential and commercial users while maintaining a uniform approach.

Summary

Senate Bill 361, aimed at amending laws related to the Orleans Parish Communication District, seeks to establish a fixed rate service charge for 9-1-1 emergency calls. This initiative allows the governing authority of the Communication District to implement service charges for residential and commercial users based on specified limits. The bill's provisions outline the maximum charges that may be levied and stipulate conditions under which these charges are to be approved by local voters, ensuring community involvement in the decision-making process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 361 has been largely supportive within the local government context, with many stakeholders recognizing the importance of reliable funding for emergency services. Community members and local officials appreciate the bill's requirement for voter approval, viewing it as a means of ensuring transparency and accountability in how emergency services are funded. However, there is also a cautious perspective among some constituents regarding the potential financial burden these charges might place on residents and businesses.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the appropriateness of increasing fees for 9-1-1 services and how it may affect lower-income households. While supporters argue that the funding is crucial for maintaining high-quality emergency responsiveness, skeptics raise questions about the long-term impacts of fixed rates on community finance. The discussion around the bill emphasizes a broader debate on funding emergency services and the role of local governments in regulating telecommunication services.