Prohibits and provides criminal penalties for the use of unmanned aircraft in certain areas and for certain purposes (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)
This legislation presents significant implications for privacy rights and property rights within the state. By defining the boundaries for drone use, the bill establishes a clearer legal framework that could help safeguard individuals' privacy against unauthorized surveillance. It also grants property owners greater agency over the airspace directly above their land, effectively reinforcing their control over their properties. Additionally, the bill incorporates exceptions for law enforcement and military operations, ensuring that necessary operations can continue under defined circumstances, thereby balancing privacy with public safety.
House Bill 811 aims to establish strict regulations concerning the use of unmanned aircraft, commonly known as drones, particularly focusing on their operation over privately owned property. The bill specifies that operating drones above such properties, up to a height of 350 feet, is prohibited without the explicit consent of the property owner. Furthermore, the bill extends to include the prohibition of using drones for gathering evidence or conducting surveillance without appropriate consent from individuals on that property. Violations could lead to fines of up to $500, imprisonment for up to six months, or both.
The reception of HB 811 has been mixed among lawmakers and the public. Supporters praise the bill for addressing emerging technology issues and ensuring that citizens have the right to privacy. They argue that these protections are essential as drone use becomes more common. Conversely, some critics express concerns about the practicality of such regulations, questioning the enforcement mechanisms and the potential for overreach. There is also apprehension about whether these limitations may inadvertently obstruct legitimate uses of drone technology for research and business purposes.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 811 include discussions on the balance between law enforcement needs and individual privacy rights. The bill allows exceptions for law enforcement use under specific conditions, which raised concerns for some advocacy groups about potential misuse of drone capabilities without adequate oversight. Additionally, discussions highlighted the necessity of defining the term 'unmanned aircraft' as technological advancements evolve, and there are debates on ensuring that laws keep pace with advancements in drone technology. This growing complexity presents challenges in establishing regulations that are both practical and respectful of citizens' rights.