Louisiana House Bill HB820

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Provides certain prohibited conduct related to lobbying (OR SEE FISC NOTE SG RV)

Impact

If enacted, HB 820 would amend existing laws around lobbying in Louisiana by introducing additional penalties for violations related to coercive actions. It specifies that violators of the new provisions could face penalties under the Code of Governmental Ethics, including fines up to $10,000 or censure by the ethics board. Furthermore, the bill outlines a process for hearings concerning individuals accused of violations, indicating a commitment to due process while reinforcing the accountability of those engaged in lobbying activities.

Summary

House Bill 820, introduced by Representative Pugh, aims to address coercive practices in lobbying by prohibiting certain actions related to nonprofit organizations engaged in lobbying activities. The bill specifically targets officers, directors, employees, or agents of a nonprofit organization who may use their authority or bargaining position to compel contributions or economic value from individuals or entities as a condition for engaging in business with the nonprofit. This proposed measure seeks to establish clearer ethical guidelines in lobbying practices and enhance transparency within the lobbying environment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 820 appears to be generally supportive among advocates for ethical lobbying practices. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect the integrity of the legislative process and ensure that nonprofits operate transparently, without undue pressure placed on potential contributors. However, there may also be concerns about how the bill could affect the fundraising capabilities of nonprofits if perceived as overly restrictive.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely revolve around the definitions of coercive practices and the implementation of penalties for violations. Critics may argue that the bill could unintentionally hinder legitimate fundraising efforts by nonprofits and restrict their operational flexibility. The balance between preventing unethical lobbying behaviors and maintaining healthy, competitive fundraising practices may become a central theme in ongoing discussions about the bill.