Louisiana 2016 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB907 Chaptered / Bill

                    2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 907
 
 
Page 1 of 5 
House Bill 907 HLS 16RS-1141
 
Engrossed with House Retirement 
Committee Amendment #3552 
 
Author: Representative Harvey LeBas
 
Date: May 2, 2016 
LLA Note H B 907.02
 
 
Organizations Affected: 
Teachers’ Retirement System of 
Louisiana 
 
EG +$4,500,000 FC SG EX 
This Note has been prepared by the Actuarial Services Department of the Office of 
the Legislative Auditor.  The attachment of this Note to HB 907 provides 
compliance with the requirements of R.S. 24:52	1 
 
 
Bill Header:  RETIREMENT/TEACHERS:  Increases the earnings allowed in the Teachers’ Retirement System of La. for retirees 
who are reemployed as substitute classroom teachers to fill certain vacancies. 
 
Cost Summary: 
 
The estimated actuarial and fiscal impact of the proposed legislation is summarized below. Actuarial costs pertain to changes in the 
actuarial present value of future benefit payments.  A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Savings are denoted by 
“Decrease” or a negative number. 
 
Actuarial Cost to Retirement Systems  	$58,000,000 
Total Five Year Fiscal Cost  
Expenditures 	$40,500,000 
Revenues 	$18,000,000 
 
Estimated Actuarial Impact: 
 
The chart below shows the estimated change in the actuarial present value of future benefit payments, if any, attributable to the 
proposed legislation.  A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. 
Present value costs associated with administration or other fiscal concerns are not included in these values. 
 
 	Change in the 
Actuarial Cost to: 	Actuarial Present Value 
All Louisiana Public Retirement Systems   $58,000,000 
Other Post Retirement Benefits 	Increase 
Total 	Increase 
 
This bill complies with the Louisiana Constitution which requires unfunded liabilities created by an improvement in benefits to be 
amortized over a period not to exceed ten years. 
 
Estimated Fiscal Impact: 
 The chart below shows the estimated 	fiscal impact of the proposed legislation.  This represents the effect on cash flows for the 
retirement systems and other government entities.  Fiscal costs include estimated administrative costs and costs associated with other 
fiscal concerns.  A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Actuarial or fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or 
a negative number.  
 
EXPENDITURES	2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-2020 2020-2021 5 Year Total
  State General Fund $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0 
  Agy Self Generated           4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000          22,500,000 
  Stat Deds/Other                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Federal Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Local Funds                          0            4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000          18,000,000 
  Annual Total $         4,500,000  $         9,000,000  $         9,000,000  $         9,000,000  $         9,000,000  $       40,500,000 
REVENUES	2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-2020 2020-2021 5 Year Total
  State General Fund $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0 
  Agy Self Generated                         0            4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000            4,500,000          18,000,000 
  Stat Deds/Other                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Federal Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Local Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Annual Total $                       0  $         4,500,000  $         4,500,000  $         4,500,000  $         4,500,000  $       18,000,000 
  
The values in the above table assume there will be 400 reemployed retirees filling extended leave vacancies each year (see the 
analysis). 
  2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 907
 
 
Page 2 of 5 
Bill Information: 
Current Law 
 
Under current law, the pension benefit of a retiree of the Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana (TRSL) who is reemployed in 
a position covered by TRSL membership will be suspended if the retiree is reemployed.  However, current law provides an 
exception to the general rule for a retiree who is reemployed as a substitute K-12 classroom teacher.  “Substitute classroom 
teacher” is defined as a classroom teacher employed in a temporary capacity to fill the position of another teacher who is 
unavailable to teach for any reason. 
 
The earnings of a retiree reemployed as a substitute K-12 classroom teacher attributable to his reemployment may not exceed: 
 
1. $0 during the period from his first day of reemployment to the earlier of his last day of reemployment or the first 
anniversary of his original retirement date. 
 
2. 25% of his annual pension benefit during the fiscal year in which the first anniversary date 	of his original retirement 
occurs. 
 
3. 25% of his pension benefit for any fiscal year thereafter. 
 
TRSL will recover from the reemployed retiree any pension benefit paid in excess of these limits. 
 
Proposed Law 
 
Under HB 907 a retiree who is reemployed as a substitute classroom teacher and who is also filling an extended leave vacancy 
may be reemployed and earn up to 50% of his pension benefit in any fiscal year following the fiscal year in which he retires. 
 
The earnings of such a retiree may not exceed. 
 
1. 50% of his annual pension benefit during the fiscal year in which the first anniversary date of his original retirement 
occurs. 
 
2. 50% of his pension benefit for any fiscal year thereafter. 
 
TRSL will recover from the reemployed retiree any pension benefit pai	d in excess of these limits . 
 
Implications of the Proposed Changes 
 
HB 907 provides that a retiree of TRSL reemployed as substitute classroom teacher who is filling an extended leave vacancy may 
earn up to 50% of his pension benefit in any fiscal year following the fiscal year in which he retires. 
 
  
Cost Analysis:  
 Analysis of Actuarial Costs 
 
HB 907 contains benefit provisions having an actuarial cost. 
 
Retirement Systems 
 
Cost Components 
 
There are two cost components associated with HB 907 
 
1. Component #1: The increased cost associated with TRSL paying benefits to a substitute classroom teacher filling 
an extended leave vacancy. 
 
2. Component #2: The increased cost associated with an expansion of the pool of teachers willing to return to work as 
a substitute classroom teacher filling an extended leave vacancy and the related cost associated with teachers being 
induced to retire earlier than they would have otherwise. 
 
Information obtained from TRSL 
 
The following information was provided by TRSL and derived from other sources 
 
1. During FYE 2015, 787 retirees were reemployed as substitute classroom teachers: 62 retirees had earnings that 
exceeded the 25% earnings limit; 725 retirees did not exceed the earnings limit. 
 
2. During FYE 2014 , 569 retirees were reemployed as substitute classroom teachers: 45 	retirees had earnings that 
exceeded the 25% earnings limit; 524 	retirees did not exceed the earnings limit. 
 
3. About 3,500 retirees were reemployed in FYE 2001 even though a portion or all of their pension benefit	s were 
suspended. 
  2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 907
 
 
Page 3 of 5 
4. Legislation was enacted in 2001 to 	substantially eliminate existing suspension of benefit rules.  A retiree could work 
and still collect his pension benefit.  By 2010, the number of reemployed retirees had increased to about 7,500. 
 
5. As a result of Act 921 of 2010, retirees could no longer work and collect a pension from TRSL.  Act 921 provided 
for only three exceptions to the general rule.  However, the number of exceptions has increase because of legislation 
enacted during the 2011 through 2015 session. 
 
6. Nevertheless, the number of reemployed retirees has decreased to about 5,400. 
 
Assumptions 
 
We used the following assumptions in our analysis of costs. 
 
1. The average pension benefit is $30,000 a year. 
 
2. The average annual salary for a retiree who returns to work on a full-time basis is $60,000 a year. A retiree only 
works half time. 
 
3. Retired teachers, reemployed as substitute classroom teachers under current law, do not return to work until the first 
day of the first full fiscal year that occurs after retirement. For example, if a member retires on July 	15, 2016, the 
fiscal year in which he retired is fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.  The last day of the first full fiscal year following 
retirement is June 30, 2018	.  The first day of the second full fiscal year is July 1, 2018. 
 
4. Under HB 907, a reemployed retiree filling an extended leave vacancy may earn up to 50% of his pension benefit in 
any fiscal year following the year in which he retires, which in our example is FYE 2018. 
 
 
Component #1 Cost  
 
Actuarial and fiscal costs will increase if the earnings limit for retirees reemployed to fill an extended leave vacancy is 
allowed to earn up to 50% of his pension in any fiscal year following the year in which he retirees. 
  
1. Suppose a retiree who originally retired on July 15	, 2016, is reemployed August 1, 2016 as a full-time substitute 
classroom teacher filling an extended leave vacancy. 
  
2. Under current law, the retiree’s total inco me for FYE 2017 (the fiscal year in which he retired) will be $30,000 
($30,000 of employment income and $0 from TRSL). Under proposed law, his total income will also be $30,000 
($30,000 of employment income and $0 form TRSL). 
 
3. Under current law, the retiree’s total income for FYE 2018 (the first full fiscal year after retirement) will be $37,500 
($30,000 of employment income and $7,500 from TRSL). Under HB 907, his total income will be $45,000 
($30,000 of employment income and $15,000 from TRSL). 
 
4. Under current law, the retiree’s total income for FYE 2019 (the second full fiscal year after retirement) will be 
$37,500 ($30,000 of employment income and $7,500 from TRSL). Under HB 907, his total income will be $45,000 
($30,000 of employment income and $15,000 from TRSL). 
 
Suppose there are 2	00 retirees each fiscal year with employment and retirement characteristics similar to the example given 
above.  Let’s further assume that the waiting period from all 200 retirees has expired.  Then the annual cost associated with 
HB 907 is estimated to be $1,500,000. 
 
Annual Cost = The number of retirees x the increase in the earnings limit x the annual pension benefit 
  
 = 200 x (50% - 25%) x $30,000 
  
 = $1,500,000 
 
The total annual cost increase associated with Component #1 	will be about $ 1,500,000 for every 2 00 retirees who are 
reemployed beyond the waiting period to fill an extended leave vacancy	. 
 
Component 2 Cost 
 
The ability to be reemployed to fill an extended leave vacancy and earn 50% of his pension benefit tend	s to encourage 
teachers to retire earlier than they would have otherwise.  As he considers his retirement options, a teacher may not be willing 
to retire and then return to work as long as he is classified as a substitute classroom teacher and is subject to a 25% earning 
limit.  As a result, he continues to be employed. 
 
However, a teacher may find it appealing to be able to collect a full pension while at 	the same time work enough to earn 50% 
of his pension benefit.  Under these circumstances, the change in the earnings limit from 25% to 50% has induced earlier 
retirement. 
 
Suppose we assume that each year there are 2	00 retirees who are retired because of Act 907 and that 100 of these retirees are 
being reemployed in the first full fiscal year after retirement and 100 are being reemployed in the second full fiscal year 
following retirement.  2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 907
 
 
Page 4 of 5 
  
The cost per teacher induced to retire early is developed below. 
 
1. If these teachers had not been induced to retire 	(i.e., they continued to be employed), no pension benefits would be 
paid. 
  
2. The 100 teachers induced to retire who are in the first full 	fiscal year of retirement will receive 50% of the pension 
that they would not have received had they not been induced to retire early. Each of these teachers will collect 
$15,000 that they would not have otherwise.  The total cost per 100 such reemployed retirees is $1,500,000. 
 
3. The 100 teachers induced to retire who are in the second full fiscal year of retirement will receive 50% of the 
pension that they would not have received had they not been induce to retire early. Each of these teachers will 
collect $15,000 that they would not have otherwise.  The total cost per 100 such reemployed retirees is $1,500,000. 
 
4. The annual cost of HB 907 	relative to Component #2 is estimated to be $	3,000,000 for every 200 teachers induced 
to retire ($1,500,000 + $1,500	,000) 
 
Total Annual Cost 
 
The total cost for HB 907 	as analyzed above is estimated to be about $4,500,000 a year for every 400 retirees 
reemployed to fill an extended leave vacancy.  Because there is no precise way to predict retirement behavior, the cost 
estimate is subject to significant variability. 
 
Assuming the additional annual cost continues indefinitely into the future, the actuarial present value cost 	for400 such 
positions is estimated to be about $58,000,000 
 
Other Post-Employment Benefits  
 
HB 907 will induce teachers to retire earlier then they would have otherwise.  If they retire one year early and a portion of the 
retiree health insurance premium is paid for by the school district, the annual cost for post-	employment benefits other than 
pensions will increase. 
 
Analysis of Fiscal Costs 
 
 
HB 907 will have the following effects on fiscal costs during the five year measurement period assuming there will be 400 
extended leave vacancies filled by reemployed retirees. 
 
Expenditures: 
 
1. Expenditures from TRSL (Agy Self-Generated) will increase $4,500,000 a year to pay pension benefits that would not 
otherwise have been paid. 
 
2. Expenditures from Local Funds will increase about $4,500,000 a year because employer contribution requirements must 
increase to pay for the larger annual cost. 
 
3. Expenditures from Local Funds will increase to the extent that school districts pay a portion of annual premiums for 
retiree health insurance. 
 
Revenues: 
 
• TRSL revenues (Agy Self-Generated) will increase to the extent that employer contributions must be larger to 
accommodate the estimated increase in costs. 
 
 
Actuarial Data, Methods and Assumptions 
 
This actuarial note was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and assumptions as disclosed in the most recent actuarial valuation 
report approved by PRSAC.  These assumptions and methods are in compliance with actuarial standards of practice.  This data, 
methods, and assumptions are being used to provide consistency with the actuary for the retirement system who may also be 
providing testimony to the Senate and House retirement committees. 
 
 
Actuarial Caveat 
 
There is nothing in H	B 907 that will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of actuarial 
opinion. 
 
Actuarial Credentials: 
 
Paul T. Richmond is the Manager of Actuarial Services for the Louisiana Legislative Auditor.  He is an Enrolled Actuary, a 
member of the American Academy of Actuaries, a member of the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of 
the American Academy of Actuaries necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. 
  2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 907
 
 
Page 5 of 5 
 Dual Referral: 
 
Senate  	House 
 
x 13.5.1: Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 6.8(F)(1): Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 
    
 13.5.2: Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000  6.8(F)(2): Annual Revenue Reduction ≥ $100,000 
    
   6.8(G): Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000