Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB213

Introduced
3/3/16  
Introduced
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  

Caption

Constitutional amendment to provide for centralized collection of local sales and use taxes. (2/3-CA13s1(A))

Impact

The potential impact of SB 213 on state laws is significant. By transferring the authority for tax collection to the state, the bill intends to streamline operations and potentially improve efficiency in the gathering of tax revenue. Local governments would still receive the taxes collected, ensuring that they retain their revenue sources. However, the amendment may alter the existing dynamics between state and local authorities regarding taxation, as local governments will have reduced control over their own tax processes.

Summary

Senate Bill 213 proposes a constitutional amendment that seeks to centralize the collection of sales and use taxes levied by local political subdivisions in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill mandates that, effective July 1, 2017, all such taxes will be administered and enforced by the state's Department of Revenue. This shift aims to consolidate the tax collection process, which currently involves multiple local collectors, into a singular statewide system, thereby simplifying the process for both the state and local governments.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 213 appears to be mixed. Supporters, particularly within the legislative committee, argue that it will lead to better tax compliance and reduce administrative burdens. Conversely, some local officials and advocacy groups express concerns that centralizing tax collection may diminish local control and oversight, which could be detrimental to community needs. The debate involves broader questions about the distribution of power between state and local governments.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB 213 involve concerns about local governance and the autonomy of political subdivisions. Critics argue that the bill could mean losing local input and representation in tax matters, as decisions would be made primarily at the state level. Proponents counter that a centralized system will lead to more robust enforcement and compliance, ultimately benefiting both the state and local economies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.