Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB217

Introduced
3/3/16  
Introduced
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/3/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
4/20/16  
Engrossed
4/26/16  
Engrossed
4/26/16  
Refer
4/27/16  
Refer
4/27/16  
Report Pass
5/3/16  
Refer
5/4/16  
Report Pass
5/11/16  
Report Pass
5/11/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  
Chaptered
6/2/16  
Passed
6/2/16  

Caption

Provides for the confidentiality of records disclosed to or by the commissioner of insurance during the course of an insurance receivership. (8/1/16)

Impact

The enactment of SB 217 is expected to significantly affect state laws regarding the management of confidential information within the insurance sector. It modifies existing statutes by providing clear guidelines on the treatment of such documents, reinforcing the authority of the commissioner to maintain confidentiality during investigations and regulatory activities. By doing so, it shields critical operational details from public scrutiny, aligning with broader regulatory trends that prioritize confidentiality in sensitive sectors.

Summary

Senate Bill 217, known as the Insurance Receivership Confidentiality Act, was introduced to enhance the confidentiality of documents involved in insurance receiverships. The bill mandates that any working papers, documents, or information collected by the commissioner or disclosed during an insurance receivership must be treated as confidential and exempt from public records laws. This aims to foster a secure environment where sensitive information can be managed without the risk of public disclosure, thus protecting the integrity of the receivership process.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 217 appeared to be positive, particularly among insurance regulators and industry stakeholders who advocate for increased confidentiality. These stakeholders see the bill as essential for maintaining competitive advantages and ensuring smooth operational processes without external disruptions. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential decrease in transparency, hinting at a conflict between necessary confidentiality and the public's right to access governmental information.

Contention

While the bill passed unanimously, it sparked discussions about the balance between confidentiality and transparency in the public sector. Critics argued that enhancing confidentiality could lead to reduced accountability, especially in instances where public welfare is at stake. The bill's supporters countered that confidentiality is critical for effective regulation and management of insurance companies embroiled in financial difficulties, thereby ensuring that appropriate measures can be undertaken without public interference.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.