Louisiana Senate Bill SB226

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Provides for performance audits for statutory dedications that include a fee for service. (gov sig) (OR NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The passage of SB 226 would have a significant impact on the operations of state agencies and programs that receive funding through fees for service. By mandating regular audits, it seeks to evaluate not only the fiscal aspects but also the efficiency of how these programs operate. This could lead to better resource allocation and help identify programs that may need adjustment or elimination based on their performance. The requirement for audits may also promote a culture of accountability within state agencies regarding the handling of public funds.

Summary

Senate Bill 226, introduced by Senator Donahue, aims to enhance the efficiency and accountability of state programs that involve statutory dedications with fees for services. The bill amends the Louisiana Revised Statutes to require the legislative auditor to conduct performance audits on these statutory dedications at least once every four years. This is designed to ensure that the fees charged for services are adequate to cover associated costs and to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the programs involved.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SB 226 appears to be favorable among legislators and stakeholders who support increased transparency and accountability in government operations. Advocates argue that this bill is a proactive approach to ensuring proper use of taxpayer dollars and improving public trust in state agencies. However, there may be concerns regarding the resource implications for the legislative auditor's office and whether they have the capacity to conduct these audits effectively on a recurring basis.

Contention

While the bill aims to improve oversight of programs funded through fees for service, some stakeholders may raise concerns about the practicalities of its implementation. The requirement for regular audits could be viewed as an additional burden on state programs, especially if audits reveal inadequacies that require corrective actions. There might also be debates on determining the adequacy of fees, leading to potential adjustments that could impact the funding of essential services.