Louisiana Senate Bill SB25

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/16
• Refer: 2/25/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/30/16

Caption

Provides for duration and consideration of certain matters during regular sessions of the Legislature. (2/3 - CA3s2(A)) (EG -$1,500,000 GF EX See Note)

Impact

If passed, SB 25 would fundamentally alter the structure of legislative sessions in Louisiana, allowing for shorter, more focused meetings. The proposed change is expected to limit the introduction of new legislation after the first ten days of the session and restrict final passage discussions after the forty-second legislative day. This adjustment is aimed at streamlining the legislative process, enabling legislators to concentrate on fewer matters with increased deliberation and accountability. Additionally, the amendment requires voter approval, placing the power in the hands of the electorate to decide on these significant changes.

Summary

Senate Bill 25 aims to amend Article III, Section 2(A) of the Constitution of Louisiana, which governs the duration and subject matter of regular legislative sessions. The bill proposes to limit the number of legislative days in annual sessions to not more than forty-five within a sixty-day period, shifting from the current system that allows more extended sessions in even-numbered years. This amendment seeks to establish a clearer framework for legislative operations while enhancing the efficiency of the Louisiana Legislature's functions.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 25 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill will lead to a more efficient legislative process and prevent the overwhelming influx of new legislation typically seen in longer sessions. However, opponents express concerns that shorter sessions may hinder the entire breadth of legislative discussions and limit opportunities for addressing a variety of issues effectively. These contrasting views highlight a tension between the desire for efficiency and the need for thorough legislative scrutiny in addressing complex issues facing the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 25 include the implications of limiting legislative days and the potential for increased voter input in the legislative process. Opponents worry that a reduced session length could lead to the neglect of essential legislative matters or insufficient debate on important policies. Conversely, supporters emphasize the necessity of voter engagement in legislative decisions, viewing the proposed amendment as a step toward promoting accountability and transparency in government procedures.