Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB281 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

                            SLS 16RS-470	ORIGINAL
2016 Regular Session
SENATE BILL NO. 281
BY SENATOR WARD 
BONDS.  Provides relative to bail bond forfeiture hearings. (8/1/16)
1	AN ACT
2 To amend and reenact R.S. 22:1441, relative to bail bond forfeiture proceedings; to provide
3 for forfeiture hearings before the Division of Administrative Law; to provide for
4 notice by mail; and to provide for related matters.
5 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
6 Section 1. R.S. 22:1441 is hereby amended and reenacted to read as follows:
7 ยง1441. Failure to timely satisfy claim under criminal bond contract
8	A. Any prosecuting attorney may file with the commissioner of insurance's
9 office a rule to show cause request for the commissioner to issue an order to pay
10 a judgment of bond forfeiture if all the following are true:
11	(1) A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered after June 22, 1993,
12 against the commercial surety underwriter.
13	(2) Notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been
14 mailed.
15	(3) No suspensive appeal has been taken.
16	(4) The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within one
17 hundred eighty days of mailing of the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond
Page 1 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 281
SLS 16RS-470	ORIGINAL
1 forfeiture.
2	(5) More than one hundred eighty days has lapsed from the mailing of the
3 notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.
4	(6) The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment.
5	B. The prosecuting attorney shall attach adequate documentation to support
6 his affidavit and submit it to the commissioner of insurance.
7	C. (1) Within thirty days of the filing of a rule to show cause by the
8 prosecuting attorney with the commissioner of insurance, the commissioner of
9 insurance shall notify the insurance company, the commercial surety, or Lloyd's
10 Association, in writing, at the address of the home office of that organization by
11 certified mail, setting a time, place, and date of the hearing, which shall not be more
12 than sixty days from the date of receipt of notice from the prosecuting attorney. If
13 after the hearing, the hearing officer finds that there is no just cause or legal reason
14 for the surety's nonpayment, the commissioner shall take any action deemed
15 necessary for collection of the amount owed, including suspension of the surety from
16 doing business in the state of Louisiana. The commissioner shall promptly mail
17 the affidavit and all attachments with the commissioner's order to pay the bail
18 bond forfeiture to the insurance company or commercial surety.
19	(2) The commissioner shall order the commercial surety underwriter to pay
20 immediately the judgment of bond forfeiture, if the commissioner finds that all of the
21 following are true:
22	(a) A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered after June 22, 1993,
23 against the commercial surety underwriter.
24	(b) Notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been
25 mailed.
26	(c) No suspensive appeal has been taken.
27	(d) The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within one
28 hundred eighty days of mailing of the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond
29 forfeiture.
Page 2 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 281
SLS 16RS-470	ORIGINAL
1	(e) More than one hundred eighty days has lapsed from the mailing of the
2 notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.
3	(f) The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment.
4 Within thirty days after the commercial surety or insurance company is notified
5 by the commissioner of the order to pay bail bond forfeiture, the commercial
6 surety or insurance company shall provide to the commissioner evidence that
7 the forfeiture was paid, or that a motion contesting the validity of the bail bond
8 forfeiture was filed in the court where the judgment of bail bond forfeiture was
9 rendered. The commercial surety or insurance company may, for good cause
10 shown, petition the commissioner in writing for an extension of time. Any
11 extension shall be at the sole discretion of the commissioner.
12	(3) If, after thirty days, the commercial surety or insurance company has
13 not provided evidence that the judgment of bail bond forfeiture was paid or that
14 a motion contesting the validity of the judgment of bail bond forfeiture was
15 filed, the commissioner's order to pay bail bond forfeiture shall be final and the
16 commissioner may take action pursuant to R.S. 22:18. The commercial surety
17 or insurance company shall have thirty days from the date of the
18 commissioner's order to pay the judgment of bail bond forfeiture or to file a
19 petition of appeal to the division of administrative law to hold a hearing.
20	(4) At the hearing, the administrative law judge shall determine whether
21 or not each of the following is true:
22	(a) A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered after June 22, 1993,
23 against the commercial surety underwriter.
24	(b) Notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has
25 been mailed.
26	(c) No suspensive appeal has been taken.
27	(d) The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within one
28 hundred eighty days of mailing of the notice of the signing of the judgment of
29 bond forfeiture.
Page 3 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 281
SLS 16RS-470	ORIGINAL
1	(e) More than one hundred eighty days has lapsed from the mailing of
2 the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.
3	D. (1) The burden of proof at the hearing shall be upon the commercial surety
4 or insurance company by a preponderance of evidence and shall be limited to
5 documents contained in the official court record where the judgment was rendered.
6 The commercial surety or insurance company may use evidence not contained in
7 the record to show that it did not receive post forfeiture notice or the post forfeiture
8 notice required pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 was not
9 properly mailed.
10	(2) If the commercial surety or insurance company does not meet this
11 burden of proof, the administrative law judge shall enter an order upholding
12 and confirming the commissioner's order to pay the judgment of bail bond
13 forfeiture to the commercial surety or insurance company to pay the bond
14 forfeiture.
15	E. A commercial surety or insurance company shall pay an administrative
16 fine of five hundred dollars to the Department of Insurance for each hearing to show
17 cause in which the commercial surety is a named party when the judgment has been
18 paid after the issuance of a rule to show cause that meets the requirements of
19 Subsection A of this Section.
The original instrument and the following digest, which constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument, were prepared by Cheryl Cooper.
DIGEST
SB 281 Original 2016 Regular Session	Ward
Present law allows any prosecuting attorney to file with the commissioner's office a rule to
show cause provided all of the following are true:
(1)A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered after June 22, 1993, against the
commercial surety underwriter.
(2)Notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been mailed.
(3)No suspensive appeal has been taken.
(4)The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within 180 days of mailing
of the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.
Page 4 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 281
SLS 16RS-470	ORIGINAL
(5)More than 180 days has lapsed from the mailing of the notice of the signing of the
judgment of bond forfeiture.
(6)The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law requires the commissioner to provide written notice of a hearing to show cause
to the insurance company, the commercial surety, or Lloyd's Association within 30 days of
the filing of a rule to show cause. Further provides that if after the hearing, the hearing
officer finds that there is no just cause or legal reason for the surety's nonpayment, the
commissioner shall take any action deemed necessary for the collection of the amount owed,
including suspension of the surety from doing business in La.
Proposed law deletes present law.
Present law requires the commissioner to order the commercial surety underwriter to pay
immediately the judgment of bond forfeiture, if the commissioner finds that all of the
following are true:
(1)A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered after June 22, 1993, against the
commercial surety underwriter.
(2)Notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been mailed.
(3)No suspensive appeal has been taken.
(4)The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within 180 days of mailing
of the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.
(5)More than 180 days have lapsed from the mailing of the notice of the signing of the
judgment of bond forfeiture.
(6)The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment.
Proposed law deletes present law. 
Proposed law requires a commercial surety or insurance company to provide to the
commissioner evidence that the forfeiture was paid, or that a motion contesting the validity
of the bail bond forfeiture was filed with the court where the judgement of bail bond
forfeiture was rendered within 30 days after the commercial surety or insurance company
is notified by the commissioner of the order to pay the bail bond forfeiture.
Proposed law provides if, after 30 days, the commercial surety has not provided evidence
to the commissioner that the judgement of bail bond forfeiture was paid or that a motion
contesting the validity of the judgment was filed, the commissioner's order to pay the
forfeiture becomes final. 
Proposed law grants the commercial surety or insurance company 30 days from the date of
the commissioner's order to pay the judgement or to file a petition of appeal to the division
of administrative law to hold a hearing. Further provides that the administrative law judge
shall determine whether or not each of the following is true:
(1)A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered after June 22, 1993, against the
commercial surety underwriter.
(2)Notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been mailed.
Page 5 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 281
SLS 16RS-470	ORIGINAL
(3)No suspensive appeal has been taken.
(4)The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within 180 days of mailing
of the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.
(5)More than 180 days has lapsed from the mailing of the notice of the signing of the
judgment of bond forfeiture.
If the commercial surety or insurance company does not meet their burden of proof,
proposed law requires the administrative law judge to enter an order upholding and
confirming the commissioner's order to pay the judgment of bail bond forfeiture.
Effective August 1, 2016.
(Amends R.S. 22:1441)
Page 6 of 6
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions.