Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB31

Introduced
2/25/16  
Refer
2/25/16  
Refer
2/25/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
4/25/16  
Report Pass
4/25/16  
Engrossed
4/28/16  
Refer
5/2/16  
Refer
5/2/16  
Report Pass
5/9/16  
Report Pass
5/9/16  
Enrolled
5/24/16  
Enrolled
5/24/16  
Chaptered
6/2/16  
Chaptered
6/2/16  
Passed
6/2/16  

Caption

Provides relative to the Greater Krotz Springs Port Commission. (gov sig)

Impact

The bill's passage will equip the Greater Krotz Springs Port Commission with the necessary tools to effectively manage its operations and funding. By allowing the commission to issue bonds without the imposition of an ad valorem tax on properties within the port area, it promotes financial viability while securing investment for infrastructure improvements. Moreover, the inclusion of provisions for adaptive contracting and partnership agreements broadens the commission's capacity to engage in economic development, facilitating growth in trade and commerce within the region.

Summary

Senate Bill 31 amends and reenacts various sections of R.S. 34 relating to the Greater Krotz Springs Port Commission, enhancing its rights and powers over the administration and regulation of port areas in St. Landry Parish. The legislation allows the commission to issue general obligation bonds and includes provisions for the sale of these bonds, aiming to secure funding for port-related developments. Additionally, the bill stipulates the establishment of cooperative endeavor agreements that facilitate partnerships between the commission and both public and private entities to enhance commerce and traffic management within the port area.

Sentiment

During the discussion surrounding SB 31, the sentiment expressed by legislators was predominantly supportive, emphasizing the bill's potential to bolster economic activity and improve the efficiency of port operations. Proponents argued that enhancing the commission's powers and financial mechanisms would benefit the local economy and lead to job creation. However, some voices raised concerns regarding the accountability mechanisms associated with the bond issuance and the commission's expanded powers, reflecting a cautious approach towards ensuring responsible governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolved around the accountability and oversight of the commission’s new financial powers. Critics voiced concerns that the ability to issue a significant amount of bonds without direct public oversight could lead to fiscal irresponsibility. They emphasized the importance of maintaining checks and balances to prevent potential misuse of the funds or unfavorable contracts that could arise from the new cooperative agreements authorized by the bill. These discussions highlighted the tension between fostering economic development and ensuring responsible governance of public resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.