Louisiana Senate Bill SB60

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 4/26/16
• Engrossed: 4/28/16
• Refer: 5/2/16
• Report Pass: 5/11/16
• Enrolled: 5/25/16
• Chaptered: 6/2/16
• Passed: 6/2/16

Caption

Provides relative to the crime of organized retail theft. (gov sig)

Impact

The amendments proposed in SB60 alter existing laws to provide clearer definitions and stronger legal grounds against those who engage in organized retail theft. By including merchandise credits as part of the definition of stolen property, the bill strengthens the prosecutorial framework for cases involving theft in retail environments. This change has the potential to enhance law enforcement's ability to pursue cases related to retail theft more effectively and to deter potential offenders by increasing the legal repercussions associated with such actions.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 60, introduced by Senator Martiny, amends existing legislation regarding the crime of organized retail theft in Louisiana. The bill expands the definition of 'stolen retail property' to include merchandise credit and gift cards that are obtained through theft. By doing so, it aims to address the growing concern of retail theft, particularly organized retail theft, which has significant implications for retail businesses across the state. This legislative change is seen as a proactive measure to combat financial losses incurred by retailers due to theft activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB60 appears largely supportive among retail associations and law enforcement officials, who argue that stronger laws are necessary to protect businesses from organized crime. However, there may be concerns from civil rights advocates regarding the broad definitions and the potential for overreach in law enforcement. The general agreement among supporters is that enhanced legal tools are needed to match the evolving nature of retail theft, which has seen a rise in organized and complex schemes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of expanding the definition of stolen property and the focus on organized crime. Critics may argue that such changes could lead to harsher penalties that disproportionately affect individuals caught up in theft activities, including those driven by economic hardship. There might also be discussions around the balance of power between retailers and consumers, particularly about how these laws could influence the shopping experience and the enforcement practices employed by stores.