Louisiana Senate Bill SCR2

Louisiana 2017 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 2/13/17
• Refer: 2/13/17
• Engrossed: 2/19/17
• Refer: 2/20/17
• Passed: 2/22/17

Caption

Provides for a portion of the monies in the Budget Stabilization Fund to be available for appropriation in Fiscal Year 2016-2017. (2/3 - CA7s10.3(C)(1)) (Item No. 4) (EN +$99,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The resolution serves as a crucial financial mechanism in managing the state's budgetary challenges. It allows for timely financial relief during fiscal crises, particularly amidst severe conditions such as flooding that have exacerbated Louisiana's financial situation. By enabling the use of the Budget Stabilization Fund, SCR2 helps prevent more drastic budget cuts or tax increases that could adversely affect the state’s economy and its citizens.

Summary

SCR2 is a concurrent resolution that permits the appropriation of $99 million from Louisiana's Budget Stabilization Fund for the fiscal year 2016-2017. This appropriation is specifically aimed at addressing a projected budget deficit in light of a reduced revenue forecast and expenditure shortfalls caused by various factors, including natural disasters. The resolution calls for legislative consent to utilize these funds, which constitute one-third of the fund's balance as certified by the Revenue Estimating Conference.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR2 appeared to be generally supportive among lawmakers, particularly given the urgent financial context. The resolution passed with a significant majority, indicating strong bipartisan agreement on the necessity of addressing the state's budget deficit through available reserves. However, there may have been underlying concerns regarding reliance on stabilization funds for recurrent deficit issues, hinting at a need for broader fiscal reforms.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SCR2 center around the implications of utilizing funds from the Budget Stabilization Fund. Critics might argue that frequent reliance on such funds could undermine long-term fiscal health, suggesting that repeated appropriations could lead to a depletion of the state's financial safety net. Moreover, discussions could arise concerning transparency and accountability in the use of these funds, particularly in light of the various financial disruptions that have been identified in the state budget.