Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB423

Introduced
3/31/17  
Introduced
3/31/17  
Refer
3/31/17  
Refer
3/31/17  
Refer
4/10/17  
Refer
4/10/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/17/17  
Engrossed
5/17/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
5/23/17  
Report Pass
5/23/17  
Enrolled
6/8/17  
Enrolled
6/8/17  
Chaptered
6/23/17  
Chaptered
6/23/17  

Caption

Authorizes the secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality to establish and administer a water quality trading program

Impact

The implementation of the water quality trading program as outlined in HB 423 is expected to significantly affect state regulations concerning water quality control. It provides a structured mechanism for certifying, generating, and trading credits, which could streamline pollution reduction efforts and promote collaboration between different entities responsible for wastewater management. Furthermore, by limiting the trading of credits within specific watersheds, the bill aims to ensure that local water quality issues are addressed more effectively. It also includes provisions for legislative oversight of the program, ensuring accountability and transparency in its execution.

Summary

House Bill 423 focuses on the establishment and administration of a water quality trading program under the purview of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. The bill authorizes the Secretary to develop regulations necessary for implementing this program, which aims to facilitate the reduction of pollutants in the state's waters by creating a system for trading effluent reduction credits. This approach is designed to incentivize both point source and nonpoint source participants to decrease discharge levels by allowing them to trade credits that signify compliance with specific water quality standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 423 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among environmental advocates and regulatory bodies, who view the trading program as a positive step towards enhanced water quality management. Proponents argue that such a program will lead to more efficient pollution control methods, which can adapt to the needs of local ecosystems. Conversely, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the practicality of implementing the program and ensuring equitable participation among various stakeholders, particularly smaller entities that may lack the resources to engage effectively in the trading system.

Contention

While the bill aims to streamline efforts in water quality management, it has raised concerns regarding the balance between regulatory oversight and the autonomy of local entities. Critics worry that the complexity of the trading system may pose challenges, particularly for nonpoint sources that are less regulated than point sources. Additionally, ensuring that credits remain pollutant-specific and are properly monitored for effectiveness is another area of contention that could complicate the bill's implementation and efficacy over time.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.