Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB672

Introduced
4/19/17  
Introduced
4/19/17  

Caption

Provides for a per ride assessment to be imposed on Transportation Network Companies

Impact

If enacted, HB 672 will impact how TNCs operate in Louisiana by establishing a formal framework for financial contributions toward state infrastructure from ride-sharing services. The funds collected from the per ride assessment will exclusively support the Transportation Trust Fund. This could potentially enhance the state's ability to maintain and improve transportation infrastructure, which has been a growing concern due to increased road usage and wear stemming from widespread ride-sharing services.

Summary

House Bill 672 seeks to impose a per ride assessment fee on Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) operating within Louisiana. The proposed legislation defines TNCs and lays out specific reporting requirements, mandating that TNCs report the number of rides originated within each political subdivision quarterly. Each TNC will also be assessed a fee of $0.25 per ride that will contribute to the Construction, Improvements, and Maintenance of roads and bridges across the state. The bill emphasizes accountability by requiring TNCs to submit detailed reports while simultaneously prohibiting them from passing on the assessment cost to riders or drivers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 672 appears largely supportive among those prioritizing state infrastructure and road maintenance funding. Proponents argue that this bill will provide a new revenue stream specifically allocated for improving roads and bridges, a critical area of public concern. However, there may also be opposition from TNCs who could view the imposed assessments as an additional financial burden or regulatory challenge, potentially leading to increased fares or operational adjustments.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussions of HB 672 involves the fairness and implications of imposing fees on TNCs without allowing them to offset these costs to consumers. While the bill’s intention is to generate funds for essential infrastructure, critics may argue that this could lead to higher ride prices, thereby affecting accessibility and usage of ride-sharing options. Additionally, concerns regarding compliance and administrative overhead associated with the reporting requirements for TNCs could also fuel debate among stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05470

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

CT SB01487

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

NJ A2205

Prohibits transportation network companies from engaging in surge pricing during state of emergency.

CT SB01448

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Drivers.

CT HB05523

An Act Concerning Insurance Requirements For Transportation Network Companies.

CT HB07126

An Act Regulating Transportation Network Companies And Taxicabs.

TX SB361

Relating to transportation network companies.

LA SB172

Provide with respect to the Transportation Network Company Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law. (See Act)