Louisiana House Bill HB688

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/18/17
• Engrossed: 5/30/17
• Report Pass: 6/1/17
• Enrolled: 6/7/17
• Chaptered: 6/16/17
• Passed: 6/16/17

Caption

Prohibits a public postsecondary education institution from inquiring about a prospective student's criminal history, except for history pertaining to specified offenses, prior to his acceptance for admission (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 688 on state laws includes amending provisions related to how public colleges and universities can handle applications. By eliminating questions about criminal history from initial applications, the bill aims to reduce barriers for students with past convictions, potentially increasing their opportunities for higher education. This legislative change is expected to improve access to education for many individuals who may have otherwise been disqualified based on their prior criminal activities.

Summary

House Bill 688 addresses the admissions process for public postsecondary education institutions in Louisiana by prohibiting inquiries into a prospective student's criminal history prior to their acceptance for admission. This legislation seeks to create a more equitable admissions process by ensuring that students are evaluated based on their academic qualifications rather than their past criminal records. The bill includes exceptions for specific serious offenses, allowing institutions to inquire about certain convictions following acceptance into an academic program or for licensing decisions in programs requiring occupational credentials.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 688 appears to be largely positive among proponents who argue that it promotes fairness and inclusivity within the educational system. Supporters believe that the bill will help lessen the stigma associated with criminal records and encourage rehabilitation. Conversely, some dissenters may express concerns regarding safety and the appropriateness of allowing individuals with certain convictions into academic environments without prior disclosure.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between promoting access to education and ensuring campus safety. While supporters argue that many individuals with criminal records have rehabilitated and should not face additional barriers, opponents may argue that universities need to maintain the ability to assess the risk that certain applicants may pose based on their histories. Furthermore, the exceptions outlined in the bill could lead to debates about which convictions are deemed serious enough to warrant inquiries after acceptance.